Normal Is Broke-Don't be Normal!

Published October 28, 2025
Visit Podcast Website

About This Episode

Hosts Rachel Cruze and Jade Warshaw take live calls from listeners about insurance, debt, car purchases, student loans, home buying, career changes, weddings, and family financial decisions. They contrast whole life and term life insurance, argue strongly against car loans and other consumer debt, and walk callers through the Ramsey Baby Steps framework. Throughout the episode they emphasize peace and freedom over mathematical optimization, encouraging listeners to live below their means, avoid debt, build emergency funds, and be honest with partners about money.

Topics Covered

Disclaimer: We provide independent summaries of podcasts and are not affiliated with or endorsed in any way by any podcast or creator. All podcast names and content are the property of their respective owners. The views and opinions expressed within the podcasts belong solely to the original hosts and guests and do not reflect the views or positions of Summapod.

Quick Takeaways

  • Whole life insurance is criticized as a poor wealth-building tool compared to buying inexpensive term life insurance and investing the difference.
  • Car loans are framed as one of the worst types of debt because they charge interest on a rapidly depreciating asset, trapping many people underwater.
  • The Ramsey Baby Steps prioritize a small starter emergency fund, aggressive debt payoff, then a larger emergency fund before significant investing or home down payments.
  • Income-driven or extended student loan repayment plans are only recommended if the freed-up cash is aggressively used to pay down principal, not to inflate lifestyle.
  • Large severance packages and big cash cushions should not reduce urgency in finding a new job; they simply prevent a layoff from becoming a crisis.
  • House purchases should keep the total monthly payment at or below 25 percent of take-home pay, even if a lender approves more.
  • Clinging to large cash balances while carrying sizable debts can create an illusion of security; in reality, net worth may still be negative.
  • Irregular income earners are encouraged to build a dedicated buffer for slow seasons and then treat all amounts beyond that as available for debt payoff.
  • Honesty about money with a partner, even when embarrassing, is essential to building trust before marriage.
  • Using savings strategically to allow a parent to stay home with young children can be reasonable if there is a clear threshold and time-bound plan.

Podcast Notes

Introduction and show framing

Hosts, tagline, and call-in format

Rachel Cruze and Jade Warshaw host the hour from the Ramsey Network studio[0:23]
They restate the Ramsey tagline that "normal is broke and common sense is weird" and position the show as helping listeners transform their lives financially[0:08]
Listeners are invited to call in with money questions[0:29]

Caller Nick: Whole life insurance regret and better alternatives

Nick's whole life policy details and disappointment

Nick explains his father started a whole life insurance policy for him around 2008[0:51]
They have been paying about 500 dollars a month into the policy since then
After roughly 16-18 years of payments, the cash value is about 150,000 dollars with a 500,000 dollar death benefit[1:53]
Nick has researched and now believes he should never have done whole life, but feels stuck because the product is front-loaded[1:16]

Host assessment of whole life vs term

Rachel calls whole life and universal life "one of the worst financial products" because they mix investing and insurance and people rarely come out ahead[2:19]
She notes that what Nick is experiencing is common with these policies: heavy fees and low cash value relative to premiums paid
They contrast whole life with term life, which is far cheaper for a healthy young person and provides straightforward coverage[2:42]
Rachel estimates term coverage for a healthy young man could be around 20-30 dollars per month for the needed coverage amount
Rachel states that if Nick had invested the difference between term and whole life premiums into an index fund, he would likely have close to 300,000 dollars by now[3:53]

Action steps: exiting whole life and securing term

Rachel advises Nick to call the insurance company immediately to understand surrender fees and what cash value he would actually receive[3:38]
She clarifies that canceling will forfeit the death benefit but the cash value, minus fees, should be paid out to him
They emphasize getting a term life policy in place for both Nick and his wife before canceling the whole life, because they have two kids[4:28]
The idea is to avoid any gap in coverage while switching products
Jade and Rachel remind listeners that insurance should be pure insurance, and investments should be separate; combining them in one product is usually costly and confusing[5:38]

Next steps for investing after canceling whole life

Nick mentions wanting to start Roth IRAs for himself and his wife and asks where to invest beyond that[6:47]
Rachel suggests fully funding Roth IRAs for both of them if possible and using his wife's 401(k) up to the employer match[6:47]
She notes that even a non-working spouse can use a spousal Roth IRA if the household has earned income
They recommend investing 15 percent of household income into retirement accounts (Roth IRAs and 401(k)s) as a guideline[6:47]
Rachel mentions that after retirement is on track and the home is paid off, additional investing could go into taxable brokerage accounts or index funds, though these lack tax advantages[7:14]

Caller Matthew: Considering a car loan after two totaled cars

Background: two older cars totaled by accidents and nature

Matthew and his new wife had her first car, over 10 years old, totaled when she avoided a pileup and went into a ditch, breaking the frame[11:37]
Insurance paid out about 5,000 dollars, and they bought her dad's 10-year-old car for that amount
Recently, a tree fell on that replacement car while it was parked at home, and it is being totaled for around another 5,000 dollars[12:17]
Matthew worries that continuing to buy inexpensive cars with cash will keep them in a loop of total losses and small payouts, and wonders if a car loan on a nicer car would be wiser[13:02]

Hosts' challenge to Matthew's logic and stance on car loans

Rachel points out that these events are simply bad luck; nicer cars could also end up in ditches or under trees[13:50]
Insurance will still only pay what a car is worth, regardless of original price, if it is totaled
Rachel suggests that Matthew may really just want a nicer car and is trying to rationalize a loan with the accidents as justification[14:58]
They strongly discourage taking a car loan, calling it one of the worst types of debt because you pay interest on a rapidly depreciating asset[14:16]
They contrast this with a mortgage, where at least the underlying asset generally appreciates over time

Applying the Baby Steps to Matthew's situation

Matthew and his wife have about 1,000 dollars in an emergency fund and approximately 2,000 dollars left on a credit card from a roughly 40,000 dollar wedding and 6,000 dollar honeymoon[15:18]
They also have about 9,000 dollars in student loans in her name and no other debt[16:11]
Rachel and Jade classify them as being in Baby Step 2: paying off all non-mortgage debt using the debt snowball after building a 1,000 dollar starter emergency fund[15:41]
Matthew expects to pay off the remaining 2,000 dollars of wedding-related credit card debt within about a month
They urge Matthew to avoid new debt, including car loans, and instead continue buying cars with cash while paying down existing debts[16:11]
Rachel explains that as their income grows and debts are paid off, they can trade up gradually: sell a 5,000 dollar car, add 5,000 saved, and move to a 10,000 dollar car, repeating the process over time[18:58]

Mindset shift around normal vs weird with money

They emphasize that living debt-free often feels "unexciting" and counter to ego, especially driving an inexpensive car, but it's crucial for long-term financial health[18:46]
Rachel reminds Matthew that because he and his wife both grew up in families that bought cars with cash, they already have a healthy model to follow and should stick with it[19:21]
She warns that once you start entertaining debt, it's easy to slip into, because financial institutions eagerly sell it and make significant profits from borrowers[18:28]

Caller Joel: Massive student loans, new baby, and emergency fund questions

Family situation and student loan burden

Joel and his wife have a six-month-old daughter and about 287,000 dollars in student loan debt[21:51]
Joel's loans are about 30,000 dollars; his wife's are about 250,000 dollars from an expensive nurse practitioner program at Emory
His wife recently graduated and is working in pediatric nurse practice; both she and Joel earn about 70,000 dollars per year[22:37]
They had an emergency fund but a recent car repair reduced it to about 400 dollars, prompting Joel to ask whether they should build a larger emergency fund before attacking loans[22:06]

Retirement contributions and Baby Steps guidance

Joel has been contributing to a 401(k) but paused it during a move and having the baby; he recently restarted contributions[23:39]
Jade strongly recommends pausing retirement investing again to free up every dollar possible for debt payoff during this heavy-debt season[23:49]
She notes she and her husband were in a similar situation with roughly 280,000 dollars of student loans and paused investing for a short time to accelerate payoff
Joel says their combined take-home is around 8,000 dollars a month, much of which goes to daycare and student loan payments[24:33]

Using extended repayment strategically

Joel had his wife's loans on a 10-year repayment plan with about 3,000 dollars per month in payments, then switched to a 25-year plan to reduce payments to about 1,900 dollars[25:58]
Jade is not opposed to using a longer repayment term if, and only if, the savings in monthly payments (about 1,100 dollars) are immediately directed to paying down the smallest loan principal using the debt snowball[24:33]
She warns that if they instead use that freed-up money to increase lifestyle or discretionary spending, they are only hurting themselves

Emergency fund size with a baby

They tell Joel to rebuild the emergency fund back to 1,000 dollars first, as per Baby Step 1, before resuming aggressive debt payoff[25:43]
Joel wonders if 1,000 dollars is enough with a baby, expressing fear as a new father about potential crises[25:58]
Jade explains that the 1,000 dollars is a "sweet spot": enough to cover many short-term emergencies while not so large that it slows debt momentum[25:58]
She illustrates that in a major unexpected expense, they could temporarily stop extra debt payments and redirect hundreds of dollars of monthly cash flow, plus tighten the budget, to handle it

Income growth and career trajectory

Rachel emphasizes the importance of Joel's wife fully leveraging her new degree in the medical field to increase income over the next 5-8 years[28:23]
She suggests that, long term, Joel's wife may be able to take on extra work and that Joel already freelances for about 600 dollars per month, which helps

Debt limiting life options and emotional impact

Rachel reflects that debt takes away freedom and options, especially noticeable when a new baby prompts thoughts about one parent possibly staying home[29:18]
She uses Joel's story as a real-life example of how large student loans from an expensive school can limit choices and force both parents to keep working when they might want different options[29:14]
They reiterate that, despite these constraints, Joel should stick with the 1,000 dollar emergency fund and direct all extra funds to debt payoff, while being aware he can temporarily adjust if a serious need arises[29:57]

Caller Michael: Layoff, severance, large cash reserve, and mortgage decisions

Situation: upcoming layoff with generous severance

Michael was informed he will be laid off at the end of the year; he works in product management for a large corporation[33:27]
He has about 100,000 dollars in cash and a severance package that continues his full salary through the end of October of the following year[34:10]
Michael's salary is 160,000 dollars plus a 20 percent bonus; his wife earns 110,000 dollars[33:35]

Current debts and assets

They have a small car loan with less than 10,000 dollars remaining and a mortgage of about 260,000 dollars at a 2.85 percent interest rate[35:57]
They have three children ages 14, 11, and 6[3:58]

Recommended steps: eliminate small debt and define emergency fund

Rachel classifies them as being effectively in Baby Step 4, since their only debts are the car and mortgage[36:22]
She advises paying off the roughly 10,000 dollar car loan immediately out of the 100,000 dollars of savings[35:57]
They recommend establishing a 6-month fully funded emergency fund given the presence of three kids and the job transition risk[36:42]
Rachel uses a hypothetical example of 10,000 dollars per month of expenses, implying a 60,000 dollar emergency fund as an illustration
After setting aside a 6-month emergency fund and paying off the car, they expect Michael will still have around 30,000 dollars left in cash[38:03]

Options for the remaining cash and urgency to find new work

Michael considers whether to invest the remaining 30,000 dollars into a broad market fund or keep it as extra cash[38:27]
Rachel notes that by the standard Baby Steps, any money beyond the fully funded emergency fund and 15 percent retirement investing should go toward paying off the house early[39:38]
Given the layoff context, Jade suggests it may be reasonable to wait until Michael secures a new job before throwing the extra 30,000 dollars at the mortgage, to maintain flexibility[40:00]
They caution Michael not to let the generous severance reduce his urgency in job hunting; he should begin looking immediately for a job that replaces or improves upon his previous income[34:54]

Philosophy: low interest rates vs debt-free peace

Rachel and Jade address the common argument that low-interest debt, such as a sub-3 percent mortgage, should be kept because investments might yield higher returns[41:21]
They emphasize that while the math of interest rate spreads is understandable, personal finance is more about behavior and emotions than spreadsheets[41:52]
They highlight that debt of any interest rate represents risk and psychological weight, and eliminating it often produces a disproportionate increase in peace and freedom[42:01]
They reiterate that their plan solves for peace, not just maximum theoretical return, which is why they advocate paying off even low-rate mortgages once other steps are complete[42:17]

Caller Jeff: Deciding how much house to buy with large cash savings

Financial position and planned home purchase

Jeff and his family are preparing to purchase their third home after relocating for a job change; they sold their previous house in June[44:46]
They have about 310,000 dollars in cash, including proceeds from the home sale, and about 50,000 dollars of that is earmarked as an emergency fund[46:04]
They are considering a property around 600,000 dollars, which feels large to Jeff, but local real estate prices are elevated[45:20]
Jeff and his wife have one small car loan with about 5,000 dollars remaining, and no other debts[46:27]

Applying the 25 percent of take-home pay rule

Rachel asks whether their potential mortgage payment, including taxes, insurance, and any HOA, would be no more than 25 percent of their take-home pay[45:47]
Jeff says they would be at about the 25 percent mark, depending on the down payment size; a 600,000 dollar house payment might be about 2,400 dollars per month, whereas a 400,000 dollar house would be closer to 1,200 dollars[3:58]

Balancing comfort, sacrifice, and other financial goals

Jeff wonders if deploying so much cash into a home is wise compared to investing more or reserving for children's education[47:07]
Jade responds that, because their investments and retirement are on track and the house would still fall within the 25 percent guideline, buying the desired home is reasonable[48:34]
She contrasts the scenario of buying the 600,000 dollar home with not buying it and instead investing the cash, pointing out that they would still need a long-term place to live either way[47:57]
Jeff acknowledges that a cheaper 400,000 dollar house would feel like sacrificing too much and might not meet their family's needs[48:13]

Emotional background and money narratives

Jeff says his wife grew up in a large family with limited means, which shapes her more cautious approach to money compared to his upbringing, where his family did not worry about money[48:39]
Rachel notes that their emotional experience may not have caught up with their current financial reality: they are now high earners with strong savings and low debt[49:54]
She cautions that while emotions matter, they should not solely drive financial decisions when they conflict with solid, logical numbers[50:08]
Jade encourages them to celebrate how far they have come, recognize that they can now afford things once out of reach, and use the 25 percent rule as a firm boundary not to cross[51:12]

Question from Jamie in Iowa: Fear of paying off debt despite large cash savings

Jamie's financial snapshot and mental block

Jamie has about 80,000 dollars in car loans and a 450,000 dollar mortgage[55:16]
She also has 300,000 dollars in liquid cash and a brokerage account with 100,000 dollars, but struggles emotionally to use the cash to pay off debt[55:16]
She acknowledges that keeping this much cash while holding high debts makes little sense logically but finds it hard not to see the money in the bank[55:26]

Hosts' analysis of fear, scarcity, and illusion of security

Jade suggests Jamie may be driven by fear of the unknown or past experiences that created a scarcity mindset around money[55:56]
They note some people cling to savings because of past poverty, trauma, or simply the comfort of seeing large balances, making the idea of draining accounts scary[56:04]
Jade points out that if Jamie used her 300,000 dollars of cash and 100,000 dollars of investments to pay off 450,000 dollars of mortgage and 80,000 dollars of car loans, she could nearly wipe out all debt[57:06]
They emphasize that Jamie's current net worth is actually negative once debts are netted against assets, so the belief that "this money is mine" is an illusion[58:43]
Rachel underlines that change is hard, even when it's clearly better, because people prefer the comfort of the familiar, even if it's suboptimal[58:03]
They stress that nobody calls the show regretting having paid off all their debt; the regret, if any, is not doing it sooner[1:00:32]

Caller Chad: Following the Baby Steps with highly irregular income

Chad's variable income profile

Chad repairs hail-damaged cars, so his income is controlled by weather; good storm seasons bring high income, and weak seasons mean very little work[1:01:56]
He typically has a 4-5 month slow period each year and saves money in advance to cover that time[1:02:15]
Chad wonders if there is a custom version of the Baby Steps for someone with such fluctuating income, because he fears running out of money in slow months if he aggressively pays off debt[1:01:43]

Using a peaks-and-valleys fund and treating it separately from extra cash

Rachel and Jade explain that many people with irregular incomes successfully use the standard Baby Steps but with an added "peaks and valleys" fund[1:03:37]
They advise Chad to clearly calculate how much he needs each month for basic expenses (food, shelter, utilities, transportation) and ensure his slow-season fund covers those months[1:02:43]
They distinguish this necessary slow-season fund from extra money that can go to debt; the former should not be thrown at debt because it represents future bill payments[1:03:40]
Rachel suggests looking for extra work during the slow months so that Chad can add more to debt payoff rather than only living off savings[1:03:51]

Caller Trey: Credit card debt, time pressure, and honesty with girlfriend

Trey's recent credit card use and partial disclosure

Trey has about 4,000 dollars in credit card debt and no other loans; he and his girlfriend are talking seriously about engagement and home buying[1:06:03]
He had told his girlfriend he had 2,000 dollars in debt, which was accurate at the time, but then ran it up to about 4,000 dollars over the next couple of weeks without updating her[1:06:34]
Most of the new debt came from buying furniture and household items (bed, pots, pans) for his third apartment after needing to return borrowed items to his sister[1:06:49]
He has been spending much of his time at his girlfriend's apartment, adding to the confusion about where his new purchases are[1:08:01]

Emotional drivers and impact on relationship

Trey admits embarrassment about his choices and says he worried that his girlfriend would question his spending given their shared interest in getting out of debt[1:08:26]
He notes that he and his girlfriend have been discussing the Baby Steps and her own debts (around 8,000-9,000 dollars), making him feel worse about his new charges[1:09:07]

Hosts' guidance: alternatives to debt and importance of transparency

Jade challenges his assumption that he had no choice but to finance furniture, pointing out lower-cost alternatives like sleeping on an air mattress, couch-surfing briefly, or buying used items[1:09:45]
She warns that feelings of urgency and time pressure are exactly when lenders and retailers profit from people taking on high-interest debt[1:10:20]
Rachel stresses that secrets about money, even seemingly small ones like extra credit card debt, can erode trust quickly in a relationship and should be dealt with promptly[1:11:33]
They urge Trey to speak directly and honestly with his girlfriend about the full amount of his debt and the recent purchases, rather than letting the show call be his only disclosure[1:12:40]
They recommend cutting up the credit cards, committing to cash-flowing future purchases, and planning a debt-free engagement ring, wedding, and honeymoon[1:13:51]
Rachel notes that starting marriage with patterns of hiding small financial facts sets a dangerous precedent for bigger issues later on[1:13:12]

Caller Andrew: Balancing retirement investing with saving for a wedding and house

Andrew's situation: impending proposal and multiple savings goals

Andrew plans to propose to his girlfriend of five years within the next month and anticipates paying for a wedding and a house down payment in the next few years[1:17:26]
He currently has about 20,000 dollars in savings; he will soon earn 100,000 dollars a year at a new job, and his fiancée, a teacher, will earn about 50,000 dollars[1:18:49]
They are both currently debt-free and plan to keep finances separate until marriage[1:20:01]
They expect to spend 200,000 to 300,000 dollars on a first home in the Chicago area, likely farther out from the city to control costs[1:19:12]

Baby Steps sequence: emergency fund, house savings, then investing

Rachel reviews that, by the Ramsey plan, they should first complete Baby Step 3 (3-6 months of expenses saved), then Baby Step 3b (save for a house down payment), and only then focus on Baby Step 4 (investing 15 percent of income)[1:21:08]
She notes that if they feel comfortable, they could fund both the house down payment and retirement simultaneously, but the plan does not require it[1:20:01]
Rachel says she is okay with people pausing retirement investing for up to about three years to save for a home, but would not recommend delaying investing longer due to lost compounding[1:21:32]

Determining emergency fund size and wedding budget

Andrew asks whether the 3-6 month emergency fund should be based on income or expenses; they clarify it should be based on necessary expenses (food, housing, utilities, etc.)[1:21:36]
Jade also factors in relational status and health: singles or those with health risks may want 6 months, while dual-income, healthy couples can often choose 3 months initially[1:21:51]
They stress the importance of talking to both sets of parents about how much they plan to contribute to the wedding and on what timeline, since deposits are time-sensitive[1:22:06]
Understanding parental contributions will help Andrew and his fiancée determine what they can reasonably afford for the wedding and adjust expectations if needed[1:22:06]

Caller Jamie (San Diego): Using savings to stay home with kids in high-cost area

Strong financial position but high local housing costs

Jamie and her husband took Financial Peace University as a wedding gift seven years ago and became completely debt-free with a six-month emergency fund[1:24:01]
They currently invest 15 percent of their household income and have about 215,000 dollars in savings[1:24:16]
They live in San Diego, which she describes as a very expensive area where they cannot yet afford a mortgage on a home[1:24:25]
They recently had their second child, and Jamie is supposed to return to work in December but feels distressed about paying substantial childcare costs while someone else raises their kids[1:24:38]

Considering temporarily living off savings so Jamie can stay home

Jamie asks if it would be a foolish move not to return to work and instead withdraw 1,000 to 2,000 dollars per month from savings so she can stay home with the children[1:24:49]
Rachel says she is okay with this strategy for a limited time, given their substantial savings and strong financial foundation[1:26:06]
Jamie notes that her husband changed careers six months ago and is on a trajectory with significant promotion and income growth potential, which could reduce the need to tap savings long term[1:25:20]
Rachel advises setting a firm threshold on how low they will allow their savings to drop (for example, not going below a certain six-figure balance)[1:26:01]
She warns that without a clear floor and timeline, they risk slowly draining their 215,000 dollar savings without noticing until much of it is gone
Rachel frames their savings as something they worked hard to build so that they can make values-based choices like this, as long as they do so with a plan and boundaries[1:26:17]

Lessons Learned

Actionable insights and wisdom you can apply to your business, career, and personal life.

1

Mixing insurance and investing in one product, such as whole life insurance, often results in high fees and poor returns compared to buying simple term coverage and investing separately.

Reflection Questions:

  • What financial products am I currently using that combine multiple functions (like insurance and investing), and do I truly understand their costs and alternatives?
  • How might my long-term net worth change if I separated protection (insurance) from growth (investments) and optimized each independently?
  • What specific step could I take this month to review or simplify one complex financial product I own?
2

Debt on depreciating assets, especially car loans, erodes financial stability by charging interest on something that loses value every day.

Reflection Questions:

  • Where in my life am I currently paying interest on items that are going down in value, and how much is that really costing me each year?
  • How would my financial margin and stress levels look different three years from now if I committed to paying cash for cars and other big purchases?
  • What is one concrete move I can make this week to either reduce an existing car loan or prepare to buy my next vehicle with cash?
3

A clear, staged plan-like building a starter emergency fund, attacking debt, then fully funding savings and investing-helps turn overwhelming situations (like massive student loans or a layoff) into manageable steps.

Reflection Questions:

  • Which stage of a structured financial plan am I in right now, and have I clearly defined what "finished" looks like for this stage?
  • How could breaking my biggest money problem into smaller, ordered steps reduce my anxiety and help me take action sooner?
  • What is the next single, measurable milestone I can commit to hitting in the next 60 days to advance to the next stage of my plan?
4

Clinging to large cash balances while carrying significant debts can create a false sense of security; true stability comes from a strong net worth and low or no obligations, not just a big bank balance.

Reflection Questions:

  • If I calculated my true net worth today (assets minus liabilities), what story would it tell about my financial security?
  • How might my mindset shift if I focused less on the size of my accounts and more on eliminating obligations that claim my future income?
  • What portion of my current cash or investments could I reasonably deploy toward debt reduction without compromising a prudent emergency fund?
5

Honest, timely communication about money with a partner is foundational; small financial secrets can undermine trust just as much as large ones over time.

Reflection Questions:

  • Is there any financial information, however minor it seems, that I have not fully shared with my partner or someone impacted by my decisions?
  • How might our relationship and joint decision-making improve if we made a habit of discussing both our fears and our numbers openly?
  • What is one money conversation I could schedule this week to bring more transparency and alignment into my closest relationship?
6

Irregular income doesn't excuse chaos; creating separate buffers for slow seasons and emergencies allows you to treat the rest of your income as fuel for progress rather than something to hoard.

Reflection Questions:

  • If my income fluctuates, do I have a clear figure for what I need monthly to cover essentials and how many months of that I've already set aside?
  • How could separating my "slow-season" fund from my emergency fund and everyday checking change the way I think about extra money that comes in?
  • What process could I implement before the next busy season to decide in advance how much will go to buffers and how much will go toward debt or other goals?
7

Using money to align your life with your values-whether that's staying home with children for a season or avoiding lifestyle inflation-requires both clear boundaries (like thresholds and timelines) and disciplined follow-through.

Reflection Questions:

  • What are my top one or two non-negotiable values right now, and how well does my current spending and saving pattern reflect them?
  • How might setting explicit limits (for example, a minimum savings balance or a date to reassess) make it safer to make a values-based choice that temporarily reduces my income?
  • What decision am I currently postponing for fear of the financial implications, and what concrete boundary could make that decision more feasible?

Episode Summary - Notes by Avery

Normal Is Broke-Don't be Normal!
0:00 0:00