Build Your Ideal Physique | Dr. Bret Contreras

with Brett Contreras

Published September 22, 2025
View Show Notes

About This Episode

Andrew Huberman interviews strength scientist and coach Brett Contreras about how to build an ideal physique through evidence-based resistance training. They cover training frequency, volume, and progressive overload, how to structure full-body and split routines, and how to specialize to bring up lagging muscle groups, with a major focus on glute development. They also discuss recovery genetics, long-term sustainability, injury prevention, glute and calf techniques, training across the lifespan including perimenopause, menopause, and pregnancy, and how to use body recomposition instead of extreme bulking and cutting.

Topics Covered

Disclaimer: We provide independent summaries of podcasts and are not affiliated with or endorsed in any way by any podcast or creator. All podcast names and content are the property of their respective owners. The views and opinions expressed within the podcasts belong solely to the original hosts and guests and do not reflect the views or positions of Summapod.

Quick Takeaways

  • Beginners can make substantial gains with as little as two full-body resistance training sessions per week if they train hard and progressively overload key movements.
  • Progressive overload and good technique matter far more than exact set and rep schemes; you must get stronger over time without sacrificing range of motion or form.
  • Most people will do best hitting each muscle group about twice per week; three times per week can work but requires more careful exercise selection and volume management.
  • Glutes respond best when trained through multiple vectors-vertical (squats/lunges), horizontal (hip thrusts/bridges), and lateral/rotational (abduction work).
  • Short specialization blocks where you increase volume and focus on a lagging muscle while maintaining others with low volume are an effective way to fix weak points.
  • Women and men can use essentially the same training principles, but their splits and exercise selection should reflect their different aesthetic priorities.
  • You can build muscle and lose fat simultaneously (recomp) if you train hard with sufficient protein, especially when you are not already extremely lean.
  • Long-term progress depends on avoiding chronic pain and injury, respecting your maximal recoverable volume, and choosing a weekly training schedule you can sustain for years.

Podcast Notes

Introduction and importance of resistance training

Host and guest introduction

Andrew Huberman introduces the podcast and his role[0:00]
States this is the Huberman Lab Podcast where they discuss science and science-based tools for everyday life.
Mentions he is a professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology at Stanford School of Medicine.
Brett Contreras' background and credentials[0:15]
Huberman introduces guest as Dr. Brett Contreras, who holds a doctorate in sports science and is a certified strength and conditioning specialist.
Contreras has over three decades of experience training everyday people, athletes, and coaches to get stronger and build larger muscles.
He is widely known as "the glute guy" for pioneering glute-focused exercises for both women and men.
Why resistance training is essential[1:03]
Huberman emphasizes that anyone interested in immediate and long-term health needs to resistance train and says the science is extremely clear on this.
Notes common questions: how often to train, what movements to do, and how to keep progressing while tailoring training to aesthetic and performance goals.
Highlights that many people want targeted hypertrophy in specific body parts like glutes, arms, shoulders, calves, or back.

Goals of the conversation

Designing training around specific physique goals[1:03]
They will discuss how to prioritize growth and strengthening of particular body parts (e.g., glutes vs. arms) while maintaining overall strength.
They will explain how to gain muscle while getting leaner and why exercise selection and movement variety may matter more than rep speed for hypertrophy.
Contreras is described as highly credentialed, deeply versed in the science, and successful with thousands of clients whose before-and-after results are described as extraordinary.

Basic programming for beginners and general trainees

Minimal effective frequency and full-body training

Minimum effective frequency for strength and hypertrophy[4:02]
Contreras says two full-body sessions per week is the practical minimum he recommends.
States you can see results with just one full-body session per week if it is very well-designed and intense, ideally with a knowledgeable coach tracking weights.
The one-day program would be a brutal, full-body day focused on big basic multi-joint movements.
Why two to three sessions per week is better for most[4:42]
Contreras notes research suggests hitting a muscle twice per week is needed to maximize gains for most people, with some evidence three times might be slightly better.
Huberman paraphrases that for someone new to resistance training, the realistic lower limit is likely two full-body sessions per week, hitting each body part twice.

Recommended sets per exercise and common pitfalls

Typical set prescriptions and real-world practice[5:42]
Contreras says his online programs usually prescribe 3 sets per exercise, while in-person he often uses 2 hard sets.
He observes most lifters in the world default to 4 sets and use "bro splits" (body-part splits), but what most people do is not necessarily optimal.
Problem of going through the motions[6:08]
Contreras notes many people repeat the same weights and reps week after week (e.g., same bench press progression) and never progress, so there is no reason for the body to adapt.
He argues that the key is not the exact number of sets but whether you are progressively overloading the muscles over time.

Progressive overload as the primary driver

Defining progressive overload[6:42]
Contreras repeatedly emphasizes progressive overload as the number one tenet of strength training: placing increasing demands/tension on the muscle over time.
He says you can "geek out" on volume and frequency, but if you are not getting stronger or increasing load/reps over time, your program is not working.
Using PRs and logbooks to ensure overload[6:42]
He gives an example of a female client whose main goal is glute growth via hip thrusts; he sets a clear daily goal such as beating a previous best of 315 lbs for 8 reps.
If she gets 9 or 10 reps at 315 lbs, the goal for that exercise is accomplished; additional sets are optional rather than essential.
He stresses writing things down in a logbook or app and training with specific PR targets, rather than arbitrary sets with no progression plan.

Training splits, frequency, and recovery

Lower/upper split and gendered goal differences

Contreras' typical weekly split[9:35]
He likes full-body training three times per week for many, or a lower/upper split across five days: lower, upper, lower, upper, lower (LULUL) Monday through Friday with weekends off.
He notes 74% of his followers are women and that women and men can train with the same variables but usually have different aesthetic goals.
Different priorities for women and men[9:06]
Many women prioritize glutes and lower body more, often wanting three lower-body days and two upper-body days per week.
Men often want more upper-body development, e.g., three upper-body days and two lower-body days.

Historical context: full-body training and exercise variety

Old-school bodybuilders and full-body frequency[9:27]
Contreras notes that pre-steroid era bodybuilders like Steve Reeves and Reg Park often did three full-body workouts per week.
They mainly used barbells and big basic lifts, squatting and deadlifting multiple times per week for strength.
Movement patterns vs. specific exercises[11:12]
Contreras defines a squat movement pattern by its side-view look, which can include back squats, hack squats, leg presses, lunges, step-ups, split squats, and belt squats.
He encourages people to pick the versions that work best for their bodies while still pushing for strength gains in that pattern over time.

Frequency, soreness, and maximal recoverable volume

Two vs. three times per week per muscle[14:34]
Contreras says most people can recover from training a muscle twice per week; three times per week can provide more results but is riskier in terms of recovery and overuse.
He distinguishes between true overtraining syndrome and the more common scenario of "spinning your wheels" due to incomplete recovery.
Modifying variables to manage soreness[16:04]
He points out that damage to muscles, connective tissue, or fascia can trigger the nervous system to inhibit maximal activation, acting like a brake when not recovered.
To manage recovery, you can adjust exercise selection, volume, and effort (how close you go to failure) to stay within your maximal recoverable volume.
He notes that some exercises, particularly those emphasizing stretch (like walking lunges), can create a lot of soreness and limit frequency.

Applied programming: movement patterns and glute-focused systems

Contreras' four lower-body movement patterns

Core patterns for glute emphasis[27:14]
He organizes lower-body work into four patterns: squat/lunge; hinge/pull (deadlift-type); thrust/bridge (hip thrust or glute bridge); and abduction (glute medius/upper glute max).
He often has clients do one exercise from each pattern per lower-body workout, usually for 2-3 sets each.
Why unilateral and certain hinges are rotated[29:30]
Unilateral movements (e.g., Bulgarian split squats) and vertically loaded hinges (e.g., RDLs, good mornings) tend to cause more soreness and are hard to recover from three times per week.
He alternates bilateral and unilateral squat/lunge variations and uses less punishing options (like 45-degree hypers) to maintain higher weekly frequency.

Maximal recoverable volume (MRV) and individualization

Concept of MRV and its application[31:36]
Contreras describes MRV as the highest volume you can do while still recovering and making progress, and says many lifters exceed it and stagnate.
He personalizes programs by adjusting sets, proximity to failure, and exercise selection based on client feedback about soreness and fatigue.
Women vs men in recovery and specialization[32:03]
Based on decades of coaching, he believes women generally recover better than men and can tolerate slightly more volume.
He observes women often specialize in glutes and lower body, while men tend to allocate more volume to upper-body muscles like arms, chest, and delts.

Mind-muscle connection, neural activation, and early-stage training

Differences in recovery genetics and soreness

Genetic variability in muscle damage and recovery[36:47]
Contreras mentions research showing people differ in how much muscle damage they experience and how quickly they recover, likely due to genetics.
He and Huberman both self-identify as people who get very sore and envy those who can tolerate marathon workouts and feel fine the next day.

Mind-muscle connection and "loadless" training

Importance of being able to flex muscles intentionally[39:45]
Contreras argues that if you can't flex a muscle on command, it is hard to train it effectively against resistance.
He encourages practicing posing or "loadless training" (isometric flexing) to improve neural control of target muscles, citing Mel Siff's concept.
Evidence that no-load contractions can build muscle[41:54]
He cites a Brittany Counts study where one arm trained with a dumbbell and the other with no load but intense focused contractions; both arms grew, and the no-load arm even grew triceps due to self-resisted movement.
He clarifies he is not advocating no-load training as a long-term strategy, but as a tool to build mind-muscle connection and assess neuromuscular control.

Glute activation and neural changes

Glute activation drills and their purpose[41:19]
He describes low-load glute activation work (e.g., light glute bridges, lateral band walks, fire hydrants) done in warm-ups to "wake up" the glutes rather than to failure.
Notes there are roughly 15 studies on glute activation work; some show neural benefits such as increased motor cortex representation for the glute after a week of focused isometric drills.
Limits of activation and importance of overload[44:15]
Contreras warns that people can get overly focused on activation drills and number of sets, losing sight of the big picture of getting stronger over time on hard work sets.
He reiterates that while mind-muscle connection is important, the main barometer for increasing demands on muscles is progressive changes in load, reps, and hard sets.

Progressive overload over the long term and variety vs. injury

Limits of continuous PR-chasing

Why you cannot add weight/reps forever[47:48]
Contreras analyzes the idea of adding one rep or 5-10 lbs each week on key lifts and demonstrates that this would predict unrealistic numbers (e.g., everyone deadlifting 600+ lbs in 10 years).
He explains that progressive overload is real but non-linear, and continuous weekly PRs on the same movement inevitably lead to plateaus or injuries.
Role of exercise rotation and variation[49:55]
Influenced by powerlifting coach Louie Simmons, Contreras favors rotating main lifts monthly (e.g., squat-and-bench month vs. deadlift-and-chin-up month) while always training all movement patterns.
He uses variations (e.g., hack squats, belt squats, different presses) and accommodating resistance (bands/chains) to change stress points and reduce joint wear.

Stronglifting and psychological environment

Quarantine experiment and creation of "stronglifting"[53:06]
During 2020 lockdowns, Contreras trained small groups of clients in his gym nearly every day, leading to unprecedented strength gains.
He conceived "stronglifting" as a six-lift system: squat, bench press, deadlift, military press, chin-up, and hip thrust.
Using competition and tracking to drive progress[54:49]
He created spreadsheets with relative and absolute strength rankings and gave awards for best lifts and totals, which made his mostly female clients highly competitive.
They used PR songs and group encouragement to push big lifts, but learned that constant max-effort touch-and-go deadlifts and very high-rep sets created long-lasting soreness and disrupted training.

Balancing quality vs quantity and mind vs numbers

Huberman's approach: make last reps harder, not easier[1:00:37]
Huberman describes shifting from counting reps to focusing on making the final 2-3 reps of each work set as technically perfect and subjectively harder, even if total reps are unknown.
He reports better strength, hypertrophy, technique, and fewer nagging pains from this focus on execution quality while still using progressive overload.
Contreras' critique and integration of quality and quantity[1:02:59]
Contreras notes that relying solely on subjective effort and mind-muscle connection can be deceptive because people misremember prior performance and self-limit.
He advocates combining external metrics (load/reps in a logbook) with internal focus (muscle tension and control) as complementary tools; each keeps the other honest.

Psychological sustainability and long-term training

Choosing a sustainable weekly training dose

Huberman's 3-days-per-week framework[1:16:01]
Huberman explains he typically does three resistance sessions and two to three cardio sessions per week, plus one full day off, to balance progress with excitement and life constraints.
He wants to arrive at the gym eager to train, not exhausted or dreading sessions, and emphasizes that many people have limited time and energy outside the gym.
Contreras on psychology and adherence[1:19:18]
Contreras agrees that psychological factors are huge but often ignored in favor of anatomy and physiology.
He notes that overzealous 5-6 day per week programs often burn people out, whereas 2-3 focused sessions that keep people excited are more sustainable and productive long term.

Work-life analogy: consistent capacity and five-year recalibration

Bob Knight's advice on sustainable work output[1:20:10]
Huberman recounts neurologist Bob Knight advising him to figure out how many hours per day of real work he could sustain weekly and not exceed that except during true emergencies.
Knight also advised recalibrating that sustainable workload every five years as life circumstances and capacity change.
Applying that model to training volume[1:22:57]
Huberman suggests people should similarly identify how many weekly training sessions they can sustain for years, then build their split backward from that constraint.
Contreras agrees and adds that modern entrepreneurs face endless to-do lists and guilt, so defining sustainable baselines in both work and training is key.

Glute anatomy, function, and multidirectional training

Glute functions and planes of movement

Primary functions of the gluteal muscles[1:35:13]
Contreras explains glutes perform hip extension (e.g., sprinting, standing from a squat), hip abduction (raising the leg to the side), and hip external rotation (turning the thigh outward).
He notes they also contribute to posterior pelvic tilt, but most programming can focus on the three main roles without overcomplicating.
Abduction and adduction clarification[1:36:24]
Abduction is moving the leg away from the midline (e.g., seated hip abduction machine, lateral raises of the leg); adduction is moving it toward the midline (e.g., squeezing legs together).
He specifies that bent-over or forward-leaning abduction emphasizes gluteus maximus and posterior gluteus medius more.

Vector-based approach and rule of thirds for glutes

From planes to vectors: axial, horizontal, lateral, rotational[1:39:40]
Contreras re-frames glute training by loading vectors: axial/vertical (squats, deadlifts, lunges), anterior-posterior/horizontal (hip thrusts, glute bridges, back extensions), and lateral/rotational (abduction, rotation drills).
He proposes a "rule of thirds": roughly one-third of glute work from each vector to maximize recoverable volume and hit the muscle from all angles.
Why only axial work is insufficient for aesthetics[1:41:02]
Historically, people only did vertical hip extension (squats, deadlifts, lunges) for glutes, which also heavily grow quads and adductors and can overdevelop legs relative to glutes.
Contreras argues many people-especially women who don't want massive legs-need more horizontal and lateral work to optimize glute shape without excessive leg hypertrophy.

Specific glute techniques and addressing common goals

Lower vs upper glute development

Best exercises for lower glute max (glute-ham tie-in)[1:44:13]
Contreras says reverse lunges are probably the best lower glute max movement but can be "too good" by causing severe soreness, so they are better once per week in a high-frequency plan.
He often uses glute-dominant step-ups (leaning forward, thigh parallel, controlling down) as a more sustainable option for frequent training.
Upper glute max and glute medius[1:48:51]
He believes hip thrusts likely favor upper glute max based on EMG, while upright seated hip abduction likely targets upper glute max and glute medius without much lower glute engagement.
He emphasizes more research is needed to fully map regional hypertrophy, but current best guesses are based on fiber directions and EMG.

Hip thrust technique and common mistakes

Range of motion and foot placement errors[1:51:34]
Most common mistake: not reaching full hip extension at the top; people load too heavy and perform partials without the full tabletop position.
Foot too far forward shifts emphasis to hamstrings; feet too close emphasize quads/rectus femoris; optimal position is where glutes are strongly felt through full range.
Bar placement differences by anatomy[1:58:00]
Around two-thirds of people can keep the bar directly over the pubic bone throughout the movement; others must slide it up toward the upper thighs at the top to avoid pelvic bone pain.
Contreras notes men more often keep the bar at the pubic region, while many women naturally shift the bar forward onto the thighs due to pelvic shape differences.

Growing glutes without growing legs

Isolating glutes while minimizing quad/adductor growth[1:39:30]
Contreras says if someone truly wants glute growth without leg growth, they must heavily limit squats, lunges, and other big compound leg work.
They should emphasize hip thrusts, kickbacks, 45-degree back extensions in glute-dominant fashion, and abduction exercises.
He cautions that many women think they don't want bigger legs but later like their leg appearance once they lean out and see muscle shape.

Glutes for men and the isolation vs compound debate

Men's resistance to glute isolation work[1:59:48]
Contreras observes some men mock hip thrusts and abduction exercises, telling others to "just squat and deadlift," while themselves doing curls and lateral raises for arms and delts.
He calls this hypocritical, since isolation exercises are accepted for arms and delts but not glutes, even though they also add targeted hypertrophy.
Simple prescription for men wanting bigger glutes[2:01:57]
For men already doing squats or lunges and hinges, he recommends simply adding hip thrusts twice a week (e.g., 2 sets) plus optional seated hip abduction.
He suggests building to around 315 lbs for 20 reps or 405 lbs for 10 reps on hip thrusts with full range, which should noticeably increase glute size and function.
If barbell hip thrusts are uncomfortable, he suggests glute-dominant 45-degree hyperextensions as an effective alternative.

Specialization phases and lagging body parts

Short, focused high-volume blocks

Evidence for high-volume specialization[2:10:13]
Contreras cites multiple studies where very high weekly set volumes (e.g., 30+ sets) produced dose-dependent hypertrophy increases over short periods.
He notes these volumes are not sustainable long term but show that blasting a muscle for brief phases can accelerate growth.
Maintaining vs building: easy to maintain muscle[2:11:58]
He references Bickel's study where subjects cut quad training from 27 sets/week to just 3 sets/week and still largely maintained size and strength for months.
From this he concludes it is hard to build new muscle but relatively easy to maintain once it's gained, which supports the idea of rotating specialization.

Examples of specialization: delts, grip, neck, calves

Deltoid specialization[2:14:55]
Contreras reports prioritizing delts with increased volume, frequency, and exercise variety (cables, machines, dumbbells, bands, lengthened partials) and seeing noticeable delt growth at age 48.
He notes you can grow specific muscles later in life if you systematically increase their workload, even without large PRs on big compound lifts.
Grip specialization and carryover[2:16:44]
He describes increasing grip strength for powerlifting by chalk use, mixed grip, and neural bar choice, plus targeted grip work, enabling him to nearly deadlift 675 lbs without straps.
Once grip was built up in a focused phase, he found it was much easier to maintain with occasional tune-up sessions.
Neck training and aesthetics[2:19:08]
They discuss evidence that big compound lifts like deadlifts and shrugs grow traps but not neck muscles; direct neck flexion/extension is needed to grow the neck.
Contreras notes he has a large neck likely from frequent isometric neck flexion during pulls and presses even though he doesn't do dedicated neck exercises.
Calf specialization principles[2:36:00]
Contreras says calves are highly genetic; some people grow them easily, others struggle despite heavy training.
He highlights emerging evidence that standing calf raises and emphasizing the stretch position with lengthened partials at the end of sets are particularly effective, whereas seated raises may be less impactful.

Body recomposition, bulking vs cutting, and training across the lifespan

Recomposition vs bulk-and-cut cycles

Can you build muscle while losing fat?[2:44:06]
Contreras argues that many people, especially lifestyle clients with decent starting body composition, can recomposition: gain muscle and lose fat simultaneously with hard training and sufficient protein.
He cites a Helms study where subjects in caloric maintenance gained as much muscle as those in surplus, challenging the necessity of traditional bulks.
Mini-bulks and mini-cuts if used[2:45:45]
For those who choose bulking and cutting, he recommends small cycles of gaining and losing about 5 lbs rather than extreme 20-30 lb swings.
He criticizes coaches who push large bulks on already overweight clients, arguing they should focus on fat loss until a healthy body fat is reached.

Training after 40, in perimenopause/menopause, and in old age

Muscle gain potential across ages[2:47:55]
Contreras says people can build muscle at any age, including in their 70s and possibly 90s, but the magnitude of gains declines with age.
He notes that if you have been lifting since youth, you will eventually peak in muscle mass and then gradually decline, but this peak is later than many assume (often in 50s).
Perimenopause, menopause, and late-start lifters[2:48:55]
He states clearly that women starting resistance training in perimenopause or menopause can definitely build muscle; they just may not gain as fast as in their 20s.
He emphasizes that starting at any age is worthwhile for muscle, bone health, and function, and that late beginners should focus on fundamentals and progressive overload.

Resistance training during pregnancy

Safety and benefits of lifting while pregnant[2:50:55]
Contreras says strength training during pregnancy is well researched and generally beneficial, improving outcomes on many pregnancy and delivery variables.
He cautions that women who were not lifting before pregnancy might not want to start heavy lifting during pregnancy, but regular lifters should usually continue.
Trimester-specific considerations[2:52:01]
First trimester: many women feel morning sickness and low motivation, making training harder.
Second trimester: often feels more normal, allowing more consistent training.
Third trimester: day-to-day variability increases as belly size interferes with some movements, but many can still squat, leg press, and even hip thrust with modified bar placement.

Fat loss, spot reduction myths, and hip dips

Spot reduction and ab training

Why you cannot spot reduce belly fat[2:53:55]
Contreras reiterates that spot reduction is a myth; doing crunches does not preferentially burn abdominal fat.
Fat loss occurs systemically through caloric deficit; ab work can build underlying muscle but visible abs mostly depend on overall body fat level.

Hip dips and glute shape

What are hip dips and can training change them?[2:55:03]
Contreras defines hip dips as the hollow region between gluteus medius and gluteus maximus, where there is no muscle belly.
He says you cannot build muscle in that empty space; lean individuals will always display some hip dips because of anatomy.
He encourages people, especially women, to embrace hip dips as a sign of leanness and muscularity rather than trying to "fix" them via targeted exercises.

Deloads, layoffs, and auto-regulation

Planned breaks and their effects

Research on one-week training breaks[2:57:21]
Contreras references a study (including Brad Schoenfeld) showing that taking a week off did not produce superior gains but also did not cause major losses compared to continuous training.
He concludes that short breaks don't wreck progress and can be helpful psychologically or for healing nagging pain.
Deloading vs total rest[2:58:56]
He typically favors reducing volume, effort, or switching to easier exercises rather than completely stopping, but recognizes that life events sometimes force full breaks.
He emphasizes auto-regulation: listening to pain signals and swapping exercises when joints or specific regions feel off, to avoid chronic injuries.

Closing themes: simplicity for most, complexity for enthusiasts

Simple template for majority of gains

Two full-body sessions with one hard set per exercise[3:00:56]
Contreras suggests that many people could get about 80-85% of potential gains by doing two full-body sessions per week with a warm-up plus one truly hard set per exercise.
He notes this might mean 6-10 exercises per session, each trained in any reasonable rep range to near failure.

Advanced nuances for the extra 15%

Who needs the advanced strategies?[3:02:56]
He frames more complex programming-specialization cycles, MRV fine-tuning, vector balancing, elaborate variation-as tools for the extra 15% of gains, mostly for very dedicated trainees.
He notes that this level of nuance matters particularly for physique competitors and highly invested lifters but is not required for solid results.

Final comments on women's glute goals and evidence-based methods

Challenging outdated advice[3:00:56]
Contreras points out that many of Huberman's female listeners likely care deeply about glute development and will benefit from glute-specific strategies, not just generic "squat and lunge" advice.
He reiterates that glute hypertrophy (not just "tone") is what most people seeking round, lifted glutes need, and that targeted glute work is justified by both science and client results.

Lessons Learned

Actionable insights and wisdom you can apply to your business, career, and personal life.

1

Progressive overload is the essential driver of muscle growth and strength; without systematically increasing the demands on your muscles over time, no amount of clever programming variables will produce long-term results.

Reflection Questions:

  • Where in my current training (or work) am I repeating the same loads, tasks, or challenges without increasing difficulty or expectations?
  • How could I start tracking a few key metrics-like weights, reps, or performance outputs-to ensure I'm genuinely progressing instead of going through the motions?
  • What specific progression target (e.g., weight, reps, or frequency) can I commit to for the next four weeks for one priority exercise or skill?
2

Your maximal recoverable volume (MRV) is individual and dynamic; doing more work than you can recover from doesn't accelerate gains, it stalls them and often leads to chronic pain or injury.

Reflection Questions:

  • What signs-such as persistent soreness, declining performance, or low motivation-might be telling me that I'm exceeding my current recovery capacity?
  • How could I experiment over the next month with slightly less volume or effort on certain days to see if my strength or energy actually improves?
  • Which exercises or sessions routinely leave me wrecked, and how might I modify their volume, intensity, or frequency to stay within my personal MRV?
3

Short specialization phases-where you increase focus and volume on one or two lagging muscle groups while maintaining others with low volume-are a powerful, sustainable way to fix weak points without burning out.

Reflection Questions:

  • Which one or two body parts or skills are clearly lagging behind the rest of my performance or physique right now?
  • How could I temporarily shift some time and volume away from my strongest areas and into those weak points over the next 4-6 weeks?
  • What minimal maintenance plan (e.g., 1-2 hard sets per week) could I use for non-priority muscles or projects while I focus intensely on my current specialization goal?
4

Long-term success in training (and work) depends on choosing a weekly workload you can sustain enthusiastically for years, not the maximum you can tolerate for a few weeks.

Reflection Questions:

  • If I imagine myself five years from now, what number of weekly training sessions and hours actually feels realistic and enjoyable?
  • In what ways might my current schedule-both for training and work-be built around short-term ambition rather than sustainable capacity?
  • What one adjustment this week (e.g., reducing a training day, shortening sessions, or adding a rest day) would make my routine feel more sustainable and something I look forward to?
5

Technical quality and mind-muscle connection should complement, not replace, objective progression; the best results come from combining precise execution with measurable increases in load or reps.

Reflection Questions:

  • During my hardest sets, do I tend to prioritize finishing the prescribed reps, or maintaining the best possible form and muscle tension?
  • How could I structure one key lift so that I both log my objective performance and deliberately focus on making the last few reps technically better, not sloppier?
  • What cue or reminder could I use in my next workout to balance "chasing numbers" with staying honest about form and true muscular effort?
6

You can achieve meaningful body recomposition-gaining muscle while losing fat-by training hard, eating sufficient protein, and avoiding extreme bulks and cuts, which often add unnecessary fat and psychological stress.

Reflection Questions:

  • Am I defaulting to extreme bulking or cutting cycles when a steadier recomposition approach might fit my lifestyle and goals better?
  • How might aiming for consistent strength gains at or near maintenance calories, with adequate protein, change my relationship to food and my physique over the next six months?
  • What small dietary adjustment (e.g., increasing protein, moderating surplus/deficit size) could I implement this week to better support recomposition instead of weight cycling?
7

Respecting joint health and rotating exercises-especially on heavy, high-stress movements-is critical to staying injury-free and progressing across decades rather than just seasons.

Reflection Questions:

  • Which exercises consistently flare up my joints or leave me with nagging pain, and am I willing to modify or replace them instead of pushing through?
  • How could I introduce more variety in movement patterns (e.g., swapping bilateral for unilateral, or using machines instead of barbells at times) while still training the same muscles hard?
  • What regular check-in (weekly or monthly) could I use to review joint health and decide whether it's time to rotate a main lift out temporarily?
8

Starting or improving resistance training at any age-including during perimenopause, menopause, pregnancy, or later adulthood-is not only possible but highly beneficial for health, function, and body composition.

Reflection Questions:

  • What stories or assumptions have I held about being "too old" or being in the "wrong season" of life to build muscle and strength?
  • How might reframing resistance training as a health and function investment, rather than just aesthetics, change my motivation to start or stay consistent?
  • What is one realistic, age-appropriate strength goal I could set for the next three months, and what simple weekly plan would move me toward it?

Episode Summary - Notes by Harper

Build Your Ideal Physique | Dr. Bret Contreras
0:00 0:00