Get Your Weekly Digest

Receive the best podcast summaries and insights delivered to your inbox every week.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.

The Diary Of A CEO with Steven Bartlett

Secret Agent (Evy Poumpouras): Never Be Yourself At Work! Authenticity Is Quietly Sabotaging You! - Evy Poumpouras

with Evy Poumpouras

Published September 25, 2025
Visit Podcast Website

About This Episode

Former U.S. Secret Service agent Evy Poumpouras discusses why over-identifying with past trauma and 'authenticity' can disempower people, arguing instead for radical acceptance of reality, emotional self-regulation, and personal responsibility. She explains concepts like cognitive load, decision fatigue, and the 'iceberg' model of personality, and shares lessons from presidents and law enforcement on confidence, communication, and decision-making under pressure. The conversation also explores victim mindsets, boundaries in relationships and work, the dangers of low-vibration environments, and how online culture and algorithms are amplifying polarization and political violence.

Topics Covered

Confidence Workplace dynamics Communication skills Emotional intelligence Personal Development Trauma Relationships Leadership and management Status and power dynamics Violence and self-defense

Disclaimer: We provide independent summaries of podcasts and are not affiliated with or endorsed in any way by any podcast or creator. All podcast names and content are the property of their respective owners. The views and opinions expressed within the podcasts belong solely to the original hosts and guests and do not reflect the views or positions of Summapod.

Quick Takeaways

  • Over-analyzing your past and clinging to a victim narrative can render you powerless; focus instead on where you are now and what you can change today.
  • Treat your cognitive and emotional capacity like a bathtub: remove non-essential decisions and obligations so you can perform and decide well.
  • You generally cannot change other people; your real lever is accepting who they are and then deciding whether and how you will adapt or leave.
  • Confidence is built more through making and owning decisions, surrounding yourself with steady people, and showing up than by obsessing about feeling confident.
  • Professional environments need your regulated, competent, team-oriented self, not your unfiltered 'authentic' self and personal drama.
  • Manipulators often use tears, identity accusations, or constant crisis to derail accountability and keep attention; respond with facts and clear examples instead of emotions.
  • Strong communicators own their voice, speak concisely, use silence and open hand gestures, and adapt their language to the listener's level.
  • Low-vibration people who live in chronic drama or victimhood can pull you down faster than you can pull them up, so curate your inner circle carefully.
  • Online algorithms feed fear and outrage, normalizing dehumanizing language that can justify real-world violence against visible targets.
  • High performers, including presidents, protect their time and headspace with delegation, solitude, study, and physical training to make better decisions.

Podcast Notes

Opening themes: authenticity, emotional regulation, and agency

Authentic self vs professional self

Evy rejects the idea of bringing your 'authentic self' to work[0:00]
• She says she wants your professional, respectful, empathetic, competent self at work, not your unfiltered authentic self.
Authentic self as 'me, me, me'[0:00]
• She characterizes the modern use of 'authenticity' as self-focused and oblivious to how you impact others and the work environment.

Evy's background and expertise

Secret Service and communication experience[0:23]
• She has been around former SEALs, U.S. Secret Service, and presidents and learned about communication, reading people, and confidence.
Brief intro reel description[0:31]
• The host introduces her as a former U.S. Secret Service agent who guarded presidents and read liars, now sharing strategies for getting respect, trust, and influence.

Why people are drawn to Evy and the problem with victim narratives

Types of problems people bring to her

Range of issues she is contacted about[2:40]
• She gets bombarded with messages about communication issues, abusive relationships, and even serious cases like a brother being murdered but labeled as suicide.

People being told they have no control

Cultural message of 'it's not your fault'[3:12]
• She observes a long-running theme that tells people it's not their fault they are the way they are because of past events, particularly around trust and insecurity.
How this narrative creates powerlessness[3:25]
• By locating all causality in the past and outside forces, people conclude they have no power over who they are now, which keeps them suppressed and stuck.

Her mentoring philosophy: avoid dependence

Limited consultation sessions[4:32]
• She did consultations and mentor sessions but capped them at one or three sessions because she did not want clients to become reliant on her.
Goal: reorient to self-trust[5:06]
• Her aim was to give guideposts, shake up mindsets, and remind people they are capable; most people just don't know how to trust themselves.

Past vs present focus and cognitive load 'bathtub' model

Skepticism about psychoanalyzing the past

Questions the utility of constant analysis[5:45]
• Evy challenges why it matters to trace every current behavior back to childhood events, saying often there is no clear reason and over-analysis can do more damage.
Sometimes people are just 'assholes'[6:31]
• She notes that in some situations there is nothing deep to unpack; the other person may simply be an asshole, and it's better to move on.

Cognitive load as a bathtub

Explanation of the bathtub metaphor[7:00]
• Your brain's cognitive load is like a bathtub that can only hold so much water; if you keep adding, it overflows and you become inefficient, sloppy, stressed, and frazzled.
Learning from presidents to keep load light[7:44]
• She says she learned from presidents to keep her 'bathtub' light, only holding necessary water, which protects from overextension and bad decisions.
Decision fatigue and busyness vs productivity[8:00]
• She warns that constant busyness is mistaken for productivity; good leaders subtract tasks from their load so they can be exceptional at fewer things.
Obama's identical suits as an example[8:33]
• She cites Barack Obama having about 30 identical suits so he did not have to waste decision-making energy on clothing, keeping his cognitive bathtub light.

Victim identity, secondary gain, and limits of helping others

Why people revisit their past

Belief that insight will unlock change[9:37]
• The host suggests people dig into their past because they think understanding why they're low confidence will let them change the present and future.

Personas who don't want solutions

Example of 'everything is bad' client[10:33]
• She describes a persona who lists endless problems (bad luck, disrespect, unfairness) and concludes such people often don't want solutions; they want validation.
Attention as an addictive secondary gain[11:43]
• She notes that after severe illness or loss, people receive intense attention and can become addicted to sympathy, seeking new problems to keep getting it.

Advice on unsolicited help

Don't try to save people who didn't ask[11:59]
• She avoids giving unsolicited advice and evaluates whether advice will even land because investing energy in someone who doesn't want change overfills her own 'bathtub'.

Iceberg model of personality and limits of changing others

Iceberg metaphor explained[21:22]
• A person is like an iceberg: the small visible tip is behavior, and the vast unseen portion includes family background, friends, experiences, traumas, values, beliefs, personality, and age.
Implication for trying to change people[22:31]
• Given the huge hidden base of the iceberg, it's unrealistic to think a few conversations will fundamentally shift someone; people become upset when they can't change others.

Acceptance, adaptability, and relationships you can't fix

Overweight husband case

Woman's question about influencing husband[22:38]
• At a business keynote, a woman in tears asked how to use influence strategies to change her very overweight husband who did not want to change.
Evy's reframing: wrong problem[24:00]
• Evy told her the real issue wasn't the husband but her refusal to accept who he is; she is living in fantasy about his potential rather than the truth.
Adaptation vs changing others[24:04]
• Once you accept reality, the decision becomes: can I adapt and stay with this person as they are, or is it a deal-breaker and I must leave?

Ethics and futility of trying to change adults

Respecting others' autonomy and values[27:11]
• She argues it's arrogant and narcissistic to impose your values on others; people have different views of right and wrong and it's their life, not yours.
Analogy to interrogating terrorists[27:45]
• In interrogations with terrorists, she never tried to convert their ideology, which had been entrenched for decades; her goal was simply to get information to stop future attacks.

Confidence, fear-based decisions, and self-regulation

Host's experience of real vs fake confidence

Pattern of romantic rejection and later shift[29:36]
• Between 18-20, he was repeatedly rejected despite following 'the book', and only later, when he truly saw himself as high value, did his romantic outcomes change.
Story of girlfriend testing him about kids[31:39]
• When his now-partner said she might not want kids, his internal reaction was calm ('I'm still deciding about you'), reflecting self-value rather than panic.

Friend's fear-based dating decisions

Example of panicked response to kids comment[33:21]
• His 35-year-old friend, feeling up against a biological clock, reacted very insecurely when a 25-year-old he was dating questioned having kids, leading to her ending the relationship.
Evy's analysis: fear-driven identity[36:57]
• She says his choices are driven by fear of not finding someone, so all his dating behavior is 'throttled by fear', which others can feel and which repels them.

Self-regulation vs confidence

Definition of self-regulation[37:51]
• Self-regulation is the governor in your mind that acknowledges emotions like panic, fear, anger, and tells them 'keep it quiet' so your external behavior stays controlled.
Her own journey from hot-headed to regulated[38:40]
• Growing up Greek in New York, she was hot-headed like her father, but training in the NYPD around highly regulated, intelligent people and strict instructors taught her to manage herself.
Safe spaces to 'put it down'[39:58]
• At home, with her husband (also a federal agent), she sometimes lets her guard down emotionally, but even there she checks herself when he notes she's 'a little emotional right now'.

Professional self vs authentic self in high-stakes work

Why she rejects 'authentic self' at work

Team orientation vs personal expression[41:07]
• In team environments like the Secret Service, if everyone brought their authentic self, you'd get sloppiness; she wants people who genuinely care about the mission and collective success.

Child abuse interrogation example

Case of 16-year-old who abused a 3-year-old[41:51]
• A three-year-old disclosed sexual touching by a 16-year-old babysitter; during Evy's interview, the teen ultimately confessed to full-on sex with the child over time.
Why authentic reaction would be harmful[42:28]
• Her authentic reaction would be outrage and judgment, but professionally she stayed neutral and non-judgmental to obtain a clear confession and protect the child from further victimization.

Neutrality, listening, and communication tactics

Honesty vs manipulation in leadership

Need for psychological safety around leaders[44:34]
• If people fear a leader's reactions, they won't bring bad news, so the leader loses vital intelligence needed for good decisions.

TED questioning technique

Tell, Explain, Describe prompts[45:53]
• She uses prompts like 'Tell me', 'Explain to me', 'Describe to me' to get people talking instead of guessing where their headspace is.

Empathy in interrogations

Sex offender's own abuse history[47:56]
• In the teen abuser case, he eventually disclosed having been sexually abused himself; she could feel genuine empathy without excusing his actions.

Gender, perception, and law enforcement performance

Are women better at spotting lies?

No clear research advantage[49:15]
• She says there is no research showing women or men are better overall at detecting lies, though brains differ slightly in discernment vs impulsivity.
Female officers and complaints[51:17]
• Data shows female police officers receive fewer complaints, likely because they are better at dialoguing and de-escalation.

Confidence: what it is and how it emerges

High performers rarely talk about confidence

Observation from elite circles[51:40]
• Among former SEALs and Secret Service colleagues, she never heard discussions of 'confidence' or 'imposter syndrome'; they simply focused on doing.

Traits of confident/steady people

Curated inner circle[53:33]
• Confident people are meticulous about who they surround themselves with, avoiding insecure people whose mindset bleeds onto them.
Decision-making builds confidence[53:43]
• Law enforcement officers are perceived as confident partly because they make life-and-death decisions on the spot without anyone to consult.

Over-analysis, naivety, and taking small steps

Host's early entrepreneurship as naive advantage

Ignorance enabled action[56:56]
• He didn't even know the word 'entrepreneur' when he started; naive about the mountain ahead, he just took the next step like googling 'web developer'.

Procrastination as avoidance of discomfort

Nir Eyal's definition[58:10]
• He cites Nir Eyal's view that procrastination is avoiding psychological discomfort, like cleaning the house instead of tackling a daunting essay.

Pedals over podium: present focus in performance

Cycling story with Sir David Brailsford[59:54]
• Brailsford banned riders from thinking about the podium and had them focus only on their pedals, which put them in a highly present, almost hypnotic state and yielded record performances.

Power of tiny first steps

Jordan Peterson exposure example[1:01:18]
• Peterson described treating a man who wouldn't leave his bedroom by tiny actions like moving a hoover 10 cm closer each day; the main barrier was people feeling such small steps are shamefully small.
Don Saladino client sneaker story[1:01:59]
• An obese client started by placing sneakers by the bed, then at the door, then in the kitchen, then walking to the corner; over time he progressed from severely obese to running marathons.

Decision-making lessons from presidents

Inner circle and delegation

Layered, steady support teams[1:03:54]
• Presidents had limited access from the broader staff and surrounded themselves with very steady people; she never saw staff crying, losing their minds, or being emotionally dysregulated.
Delegation to experts[1:03:52]
• They delegated to people who knew more in specific areas, did not need to know everything themselves, and were comfortable making decisions without full information.

Study, work ethic, and solitude

Late-night study habits[1:04:50]
• She recalls Bill Clinton and Barack Obama up late reading and preparing, and Obama still at his desk during her midnight shifts.
Time alone and going home[1:05:34]
• Presidents took time alone and returned to their roots (e.g., Bush to his ranch, Obama to Hawaii, Bush Sr. to Kennebunkport and Texas) to think and reconnect.

Physical exercise as part of leadership

Presidential workout routines[1:07:50]
• She mentions George W. Bush as a runner then biker, Clinton as a runner, and Obama in the gym every morning, integrating body and mind for performance and confidence.

Nature of low confidence and paralinguistics

Four ways low confidence is felt

Physical, mental, emotional, behavioral[1:11:30]
• The host lists: bodily signs (tightness, fidgeting, heart racing), mental patterns (self-doubt, worst-case rumination), emotional feelings (insecurity, fear of exposure), and behaviors (soft speech, rushing, avoiding eye contact, over-apologizing).

Evy's focus on 'how' over 'what' in speech

Owning your voice[1:12:03]
• She speaks from a deeper, authentic tone and avoids high-pitched speech, even around her daughter, because research shows voice quality shapes perceived authority and respect.
Speaking for the audience, not self[1:14:19]
• She views podcast appearances as being about the audience; she and the host are 'irrelevant' except as channels for information that might make listeners' lives better.

Silence, pace, and owning time

Use of pauses as confidence signal[1:15:20]
• She learned from watching Obama that confident speakers don't rush to apologize for taking time; they pause, own their time, and give listeners space to absorb.
Avoiding self-undermining phrases[1:17:22]
• Preambles like 'I don't want to waste your time' signal that what you're about to say isn't important and cause people to tune out.

Hand gestures, trust, and engagement

Hands as trust cues[1:18:41]
• She explains that hidden hands are associated with deceit and threat, whereas visible open hands signal 'no weapons' at a deep psychological level.
Camera steals energy[1:20:01]
• A news producer told her cameras steal about 20-25% of your energy, so you must project more to keep viewers engaged, especially given people's tendency to mentally drift.

Adapting communication to the listener

Mirandizing as a diagnostic tool

Having subjects read their rights aloud[1:24:57]
• She had people read Miranda rights aloud and then asked simple biographical questions to assess their language level and then matched her speech to theirs.

Simplifying language for accessibility

New York Times and book-writing examples[1:26:11]
• She notes the New York Times writes at roughly an 8th-grade level; she deliberately wrote her own book in an easy style so readers wouldn't need a 'nap' after each chapter.

Contribution score, brevity, and workplace communication

Over-talkers vs concise contributors

Sarah vs Cahill brainstorm example[1:28:17]
• The host compares a colleague who thought out loud and was frequently cut off to one who spoke rarely but with well-formed points, whose contributions commanded attention.
Evy's internal 'land the plane' reaction[1:29:47]
• When people are long-winded, she thinks 'land the plane' because of limited time and many conversations ahead; higher up you have less bandwidth for rambling.

Hiring motivations and service orientation

Secret Service applicant answers[1:31:29]
• When she asked why they wanted to be agents, some said for the challenge and to see if they could do it; others said to serve and protect; the service-oriented ones were the ones who made it through.

Provocation, manipulation and using facts

Not being easily offended in law enforcement

High tolerance needed for public abuse[1:35:31]
• She regularly faced people yelling, filming, and claiming rights violations when asked to move; she had to suppress her 'New York' impulse to fight back physically.

Reactance and autonomy

People hate being told what to do[1:37:26]
• She links public backlash against COVID masks to 'reactance'-the psychological pushback when people feel their autonomy is removed.

Responding with legal facts and choices

Citing title codes and options[1:39:54]
• She would explain that someone was impeding her duties under a specific U.S. code and offer them a choice: move across the street voluntarily or face arrest.

Crying and identity as manipulation tactics

Emotional displays derail accountability[1:42:23]
• She notes suspects or employees may cry or invoke identity-based claims ('you're doing this because I'm X') to make you feel bad and stop questioning or disciplining them.

Using specific facts in difficult conversations

Avoid vague 'I feel' complaints[1:44:37]
• Instead of saying 'I feel disrespected', she advises anchoring concerns to concrete episodes (meetings, specific statements) and outcomes, which are harder to refute.
Writing things down as preparation[1:45:05]
• She recommends writing notes for meetings, openly telling your boss you're glancing at them to stay clear, which helps nervous people communicate more effectively.

Reading written statements and cognitive dissonance

Baby broken arm case: nanny vs dad

Using written day narratives[1:48:00]
• She asked both dad and nanny to write what they did from waking to sleeping on the incident date; dad's statement felt clean while nanny's was loaded with frustration.
Key phrase revealing guilt[1:49:33]
• Nanny wrote 'then I gave the baby Tylenol and it went quiet'; the abrupt shift indicated to Evy that this was the moment the arm was broken and the baby passed out from pain.

Cognitive dissonance and self-justification

We justify behavior to protect self-image[1:50:59]
• They discuss how people rationalize bad habits or harmful acts (e.g., being 'too busy' to exercise) to reconcile them with their desired self-image.

Having a trusted person to call out your BS

Role of Evy's husband[1:52:11]
• Her husband, also a special agent and SWAT, is a steady soundboard who will challenge her thinking and whose credibility she trusts because he doesn't constantly critique.
Self-check when frequently triggered[1:54:58]
• If everything offends or upsets you and you feel compelled to broadcast it, she suggests pausing to ask what is going on within you, as the starting point is always internal.

Friends, inner circle, and low vibration people

Shrinking friendship circles with age

Research on inner circles over time[1:55:12]
• She cites research that as people age, their inner circle gets smaller; she has many acquaintances but can count true friends on one hand.

Defining a true friend

Unconditional trust and consistency[1:56:16]
• A true friend is someone you'd give unconditional trust to, with long-term consistency and no betrayal, like the host's colleague Jack of seven years.

Low vibration people and drowning rescues

Definition of low vibration[1:59:33]
• Low vibration people are those constantly in victimhood, drama, or problems, draining those around them without necessarily attacking directly.
Rescue analogy from water training[2:00:47]
• In search and rescue, the panicking person can kill their rescuer by grabbing and pushing them under; similarly, some people you try to save in life can drown you.
Responsibility for where you go and who you choose[2:01:42]
• She insists individuals are responsible for decisions about environments and relationships; repeated exposure to chaotic people means you're partly choosing that volatility.

Workplace complaining, low performance, and 'you're not that special'

Complaining culture and impact on teams

Allowing excuses hurts culture[2:04:18]
• Evy warns that over-bending to personal issues at work can enable poor performance and harm the rest of the team.

Low performer trait: oversharing personal life

Inappropriate personal storytelling to bosses[2:04:56]
• A red flag is when employees respond to work questions by launching into detailed personal stories, showing a lack of awareness about time and context.

Meaning of 'you're not that special'

Dangers of self-exceptionalism[2:06:00]
• Thinking you're uniquely special can morph into believing your problems and pain are unique exceptions, making you unreachable because no advice seems applicable.

Predators, prey, and abusive relationships

Predators target easier victims

Why certain people attract abusers[2:07:24]
• Predators, including abusive partners, look for people who seem easy to take down, mold, or manipulate; they don't want a fair fight or strong counter-predator.
Children and elderly as common crime victims[2:09:24]
• Children and the elderly are disproportionately abused because they are the easiest to overpower and exploit.

Limits of advice in severe abuse

Chronic abuse can't be fixed with skills[2:11:33]
• She tells some clients that no set of confidence skills can help while they stay with someone who is continually demolishing them; the abuse overwhelms any self-work.
People want help to stay, not leave[2:12:12]
• Often abuse victims look for strategies to change the abuser so they can stay, rather than accept that the truth is fundamentally who the person is.

Boundaries with family and early red flags

Host's stance on family boundaries

Cutting off inappropriate relative[2:14:00]
• At 18, he told siblings he would cut off an extended family member who was being inappropriate; that person now treats him best, perhaps sensing his low tolerance for mistreatment.
Zero tolerance for shouting[2:14:21]
• Having grown up where shouting was constant, he and his siblings now have relationships where disagreements are handled calmly; he would physically leave when shouting began in a prior relationship.

Testing boundaries in work relationships

Non-responsiveness as early signal[2:17:55]
• Evy views someone taking four days to reply to a work email as a major red flag; she will test again and, if repeated, mentally decide 'we're done' and look for a way to part ways.

Charlie Kirk shooting, copycats, and online dehumanization

Why this attack is uniquely concerning

Shift from politicians to media figures as targets[2:20:02]
• Unlike heads of state or elected officials, Charlie Kirk is a media figure; his shooting signals that anyone with a platform expressing views can be considered fair game.
Copycat risk[2:22:41]
• Once one person successfully carries out such an attack, others may say 'he did it, I can do it', especially because media figures are softer targets than heavily protected politicians.

Secret Service perspective on protection limits

Rooftop counter-snipers would have been needed[2:25:13]
• She explains there was nothing Kirk's team could realistically do against a distant rifle shot besides having counter-snipers on rooftops, which is not standard for non-state figures.
Body armor limitations[2:26:23]
• Typical vests protect against pistol and some shotgun rounds, not rifle rounds; they also leave the neck and head exposed, which is where Kirk was hit.

Mental health, social media threats, and lack of empathy

Rise of remote threats via social media[2:29:00]
• Her former Protective Intelligence Unit used to track letter writers and in-person stalkers; now, social media enables countless threats from home, overwhelming systems.
Desensitization and empathy erosion[2:29:55]
• Constant exposure to hateful online comments and threats makes such language feel normal and reduces people's empathetic response.

Algorithms, fear, and polarization

How recommendation algorithms trap users

Dwell time and feedback loop[2:33:08]
• The host explains that social platforms show more of whatever you spend time on; his older relative ended up in a racist, fear-driven TikTok feed simply by dwelling on such content.
Resetting an algorithm in practice[2:33:50]
• He used TikTok's reset function and deliberately interacted with benign content (like music videos) on her account to change what she was shown.

Fear-based feeds and lack of middle ground

Everything framed as threats[2:36:53]
• Evy observes that whatever a person is afraid of (migrants, shootings, etc.) will be amplified by these feeds, with very little middle ground and constant fear stimuli.

Mass shootings patterns and notoriety motivation

Distinction between school and mass shootings

One-on-one vs indiscriminate attacks[2:41:14]
• She clarifies that 'school shooting' can mean any shooting on school grounds (e.g., one student shooting another), whereas 'mass shooting' is indiscriminate attacks like recent U.S. cases.

Common features of mass shooters

Connection, trigger event, planning, access[2:42:20]
• They often have some link to the target place, experience a triggering life event, plan and telegraph intentions (sometimes via social media), and crucially have access to weapons.

Notoriety and villainization as drivers

Seeking significance via violence[2:46:42]
• In the Kirk case, the shooter allegedly bragged on Discord afterwards; some see such acts as a way to gain attention and perceived heroism.
Danger of dehumanizing language[2:48:04]
• Relentless online framing of people as monsters or villains can lead someone to feel morally justified in attacking them: 'I'm a hero stopping this horrible person.'

Secret Service stress, 'wheels up', and closing reflections

Secret Service protective scope

Range of protectees[2:52:07]
• She has protected presidents, former presidents, first ladies, their children, cabinet secretaries, and foreign heads of state visiting the U.S.

Emotional burden and relief after missions

Constant threat scanning and long shifts[2:53:52]
• On protection details she was always mentally asking 'where's my threat?' with shifts sometimes lasting 16-18 hours, leading to 'wheels up parties' when the protectee's plane finally took off.

Key message to listeners about capability

You are more capable than you think[2:40:27]
• She emphasizes that despite trauma, low confidence, or social messages that excuse inaction, people are absolutely capable of achieving what they want.

Closing question: joy and fear

Her daughter as greatest joy and fear[2:41:34]
• Motherhood brings her the most joy but also the deepest fear, because she knows she cannot fully shield her daughter from the dangers she has seen in her work.

Lessons Learned

Actionable insights and wisdom you can apply to your business, career, and personal life.

1

Spending your energy psychoanalyzing why you became who you are is less useful than accepting the reality in front of you and deciding what to change now.

Reflection Questions:

  • • What current situation in your life are you still explaining with an old story instead of asking what you can do about it today?
  • • How might your choices shift if you accepted the 'iceberg' of who someone is and stopped trying to redesign them according to your expectations?
  • • What is one concrete behavior you could change this week that would improve your present, regardless of how you got here?
2

Your cognitive and emotional capacity is finite, like a bathtub, so high performance requires subtracting low-value decisions, obligations, and over-analysis rather than constantly adding more.

Reflection Questions:

  • • Where in your day are you repeatedly making trivial decisions (like clothing, food, or meetings) that you could standardize or delegate?
  • • How is overthinking or ruminating about a problem overfilling your 'bathtub' and making you less effective at the tasks that truly matter?
  • • What are three specific things you can remove from your schedule or decision list this week to lighten your cognitive load?
3

You generally cannot change other adults against their will; your real power lies in accepting who they are, setting boundaries, and choosing whether to adapt or walk away.

Reflection Questions:

  • • Who in your life are you secretly trying to 'fix' instead of honestly deciding whether you can live with them as they are?
  • • How would your stress levels change if you stopped treating their behavior as a problem to solve and treated your response as the real decision?
  • • What boundary or exit plan do you need to design now so that you're no longer trapped in a relationship you're hoping will magically transform?
4

Confidence is less about feeling a certain way and more about repeatedly making decisions, taking responsibility for outcomes, and surrounding yourself with steady, high-standard people.

Reflection Questions:

  • • In what areas of your life are you postponing decisions because you're waiting to 'feel more confident' first?
  • • How might your sense of self-respect grow if you started measuring yourself by the quality of your decisions and follow-through rather than by external approval?
  • • Which relationship or environment in your inner circle is quietly eroding your steadiness, and what step could you take to upgrade that circle?
5

Emotional self-regulation and professional composure-owning your voice, pace, and reactions-create far more influence and respect than bringing your unfiltered 'authentic' emotions into every situation.

Reflection Questions:

  • • What recurring trigger (a comment, email, or behavior) most often pulls you into reactive, unregulated behavior at work or at home?
  • • How would your outcomes differ if you paused to name what you're feeling, lowered your voice, and responded with specific facts instead of emotion?
  • • What is one high-stakes context (a meeting, negotiation, or difficult conversation) where you can deliberately slow your speech, use pauses, and own the room this week?
6

Your environment and inner circle strongly shape your 'vibration'; repeatedly exposing yourself to low-vibration, drama-driven people will drag you down faster than you can pull them up.

Reflection Questions:

  • • Who in your life consistently leaves you feeling drained, chaotic, or smaller after interactions, even if they never attack you directly?
  • • How could you respectfully reduce your exposure to that person or context without abandoning your values or commitments?
  • • What specific type of person (qualities, not titles) do you want more of in your inner circle, and where can you start looking for them?

Episode Summary - Notes by Charlie

Secret Agent (Evy Poumpouras): Never Be Yourself At Work! Authenticity Is Quietly Sabotaging You! - Evy Poumpouras
0:00 0:00