Get Your Weekly Digest

Receive the best podcast summaries and insights delivered to your inbox every week.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.

We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network

TIP763: Investing Lessons for My 18-Year-Old Self w/ Clay Finck

Published October 24, 2025
Visit Podcast Website

About This Episode

Host Clay Finck delivers a solo episode structured as a letter to his 18-year-old self, sharing 12 key lessons from his investing journey, including starting early, using index funds, focusing on great businesses, and managing emotions. He explains why beating the market is difficult but possible, how patience and time horizons create an edge, and why moats, management quality, and megatrends matter more than simple valuation metrics like P/E. The episode also covers investor psychology, avoiding unnecessary complexity, building a peer network, and developing an independent, process-driven investment philosophy that fits one's personality and goals.

Topics Covered

Investing Stock market valuation Return on invested capital (ROIC) Behavioral economics Cognitive biases Personal Development Entrepreneurship Megafauna Semiconductors Digital advertising

Disclaimer: We provide independent summaries of podcasts and are not affiliated with or endorsed in any way by any podcast or creator. All podcast names and content are the property of their respective owners. The views and opinions expressed within the podcasts belong solely to the original hosts and guests and do not reflect the views or positions of Summapod.

Quick Takeaways

  • Starting to invest as early as possible and contributing consistently, even small amounts, allows compounding to work in your favor over decades.
  • Beating the market is difficult but not impossible; individual investors can exploit structural and behavioral advantages that many professional managers don't have.
  • Patience and a long time horizon are among an investor's greatest edges, especially when paired with ownership of a few great, moat-protected businesses.
  • Most stocks are mediocre; the bulk of long-term market wealth comes from a small minority of exceptional companies with durable competitive advantages.
  • Valuation matters, but focusing narrowly on metrics like the P/E ratio can cause investors to miss dominant, fast-growing businesses.
  • Your total return from any stock comes from earnings growth, changes in the valuation multiple, and shareholder returns (buybacks and dividends).
  • Clear megatrends such as digital advertising and semiconductors can create powerful tailwinds for industry leaders, but cyclicality and competition still matter.
  • Common psychological biases-loss aversion, herd mentality, overconfidence, and confirmation bias-regularly lead investors astray unless actively managed.
  • Keeping your strategy and portfolio simple and within your circle of competence is often more effective than using complex instruments or frequent trading.
  • Independent thinking and a process you truly understand are essential to hold through volatility and avoid being shaken out of your best ideas.

Podcast Notes

Introduction and purpose of the episode

Framing the episode as a letter to his 18-year-old self

Clay describes starting to invest at 18 without knowing what he was doing and being surrounded by conflicting opinions about the stock market[0:08]
• Some people told him investing was like gambling, others cautioned him, and some pitched opaque ideas like an offshore drilling company he didn't understand
He positions the episode as sharing 12 key lessons learned over 13 years of investing and making many mistakes[0:21]
• He emphasizes the list is not exhaustive and continues to grow as he makes more mistakes
Acknowledges that what works for him may not work for everyone[1:47]
• Investing is part art and part business, so there is no single exact way to win, but guidelines and frameworks are needed
States his goal is to offer useful lessons to newer listeners who may be overwhelmed by market noise[0:41]

Lesson 1: The best time to invest is today

Why trying to time the market is so hard

Clay recalls that when he followed financial news, he constantly heard that the market was overvalued[2:33]
• After losing 100% of his first $1,000 investment in an offshore drilling company, he was especially wary of investing into an "overvalued" market
He graduated college in 2017 when the prevailing narrative was that the market was overpriced and a crash was imminent[2:56]
• Since 2017, the S&P 500 has nearly tripled, so he's glad he didn't sit on the sidelines waiting for a downturn
Quotes Peter Lynch on how more money is lost preparing for corrections than in corrections themselves[3:15]
• Lynch also said no one can predict interest rates, the economy, or the stock market, so investors should focus on what's happening to the companies they own
Illustrates 2020 COVID crash as an example of how hard it would have been to deploy cash despite a 30% market drop[3:57]
• Earnings were collapsing, pessimism was high, and governments panicked, so there were many plausible reasons not to buy even at the lows
• The market bottomed when it was least expected and quickly made new highs, showing how difficult timing is

Being skeptical of market forecasters and incentives

Warns that many so-called experts sound smart but give terrible advice[5:01]
• Some of the most confident voices with the biggest microphones often have poor track records
Before taking advice, understand both the person's track record and their incentive structure[5:11]
• Example: if someone pitching a stock has returned only 5% annually over a decade, that should affect how seriously you take their ideas
• Conversely, if an investor with a 20% annual track record allocates a third of their portfolio to a stock, Clay views it differently-but still not as blind instruction
Explains that financial media are incentivized to generate clicks and views, so calling for crashes or extreme views is rewarded[6:15]

Starting early and compounding

As an 18-year-old, you have an exceptionally long investing runway, which is a huge advantage[6:47]
• He urges starting to invest regardless of amount, even $50-$100 per month
Highlights the power of compounding at 10% per year with concrete examples[7:20]
• At 10% annual compounding, $1 becomes $3 by age 30, $21 by age 50, and $142 by age 70
• Says compounding tests patience in early years and causes bewilderment in later years

Lesson 2: It is possible to beat the market, but start with indexing

Debating the claim that beating the market is impossible

Describes a camp of investors who believe beating the S&P 500 is virtually impossible for individuals[7:38]
• In that view, anyone who outperforms must have just gotten lucky, and only rare figures like Warren Buffett can sustainably outperform
They therefore advocate simply buying low-cost index ETFs and not picking individual stocks[8:25]
Clay disagrees with the idea that stock-picking is a wasted effort, while acknowledging indexing works for many[8:29]

Evidence that many stocks do beat the index

He notes headlines claiming a few mega-cap stocks drive most index gains, making it seem like winning stocks are rare needles in a haystack[8:55]
Provides data: in the current year, with the S&P 500 up 15%, 167 of ~500 companies have returns above 15%[8:40]
• This means a substantial minority of index constituents are beating the market, not just a handful
Highlights years where a majority of stocks outperformed[10:02]
• In 2022, 57% of stocks outperformed the index; in 2019, 46% did, showing outperformance is not extremely rare at the stock level

Why so many professional managers underperform

Cites research from Larry Swedroe that over a 15-year period ending June 2019, about 90% of large-, mid-, and small-cap funds underperformed their S&P benchmarks[10:29]
Asks whether many managers truly try to beat the market or mainly manage to protect assets under management and client relationships[10:54]
• Managers often hug the index to avoid looking too different, and fees then almost guarantee underperformance
Points out that short holding periods hurt returns[11:50]
• Average holding period was about 5 years in the 1970s, but is around 10 months today, and research shows shorter holding periods correlate with lower returns
Explains how institutional constraints and career risk work against outperformance[12:19]
• Regulations and risk frameworks may force managers to trim winning positions once they exceed certain portfolio weights
• Concentrated portfolios can actually be less risky if composed of durable, high-quality firms, but their higher volatility can upset clients
• Managers face career risk if contrarian positions underperform in the short term, so they often default to consensus ideas
• Very large funds can't easily deploy capital into smaller, less liquid companies where inefficiencies are larger, limiting their opportunity set
Concludes that while beating the market is not easy, understanding these structural and behavioral issues helps individuals position themselves better[14:14]

Lesson 3: Patience is a major edge

The value of a long time horizon

Clay says investors chasing quick 10-20% gains operate in a crowded, highly competitive space[14:34]
• He argues that real wealth in markets is created over the long term, not through rapid trading
Quotes Thomas Phelps: to make money in stocks you need vision, courage, and patience-with patience being the rarest[14:55]
Notes that anyone can buy a great business, but few can hold one for 10+ years through volatility and boredom[15:12]

Partnering with long-term oriented management

Encourages partnering with managers who explicitly focus on maximizing long-term shareholder value[15:20]
• He prizes management teams that are shareholder-friendly, have skin in the game, and are motivated by more than just money
Discusses Warren Buffett's preference for "fanatic" managers when Berkshire buys businesses[16:07]
• Buffett knows many such managers become extremely wealthy after selling to Berkshire, so their continued drive must come from passion for the business, not money
Shares example of Heico and the Mendelssohn family as "fanatics" who work intensely on their business and think in terms of maximizing long-term free cash flow per share[16:46]
• He notes that such companies may look unattractive on simple metrics like P/E because they reinvest heavily in marketing or R&D, suppressing current earnings to boost long-term value

Time horizon as a competitive advantage

Quotes Jeff Bezos on how competing on a 7-year horizon dramatically reduces competition versus a 3-year horizon[17:22]
Explains hyperbolic discounting: investors overweight the near term and heavily discount large payoffs far in the future[18:07]
• A company might look fairly priced on a 3-year view but absurdly cheap on a 15-20 year view because compounding is underappreciated
• Mentions examples like stocks dropping after quarterly misses or languishing for a year, creating opportunities for patient investors

Lesson 4: Most stocks are mediocre; focus on simple, great businesses with moats

Why great businesses matter disproportionately

Quotes Buffett that it's better to buy a wonderful business at a fair price than a fair business at a wonderful price[22:01]
References Hendrik Bessembinder's study showing that since 1926, about 4% of stocks generated all the excess returns over Treasury bills[22:17]
• The surprising result is that the average stock loses money relative to T-bills, even though the overall market returns ~10% annually due to a few huge winners
Concludes that long-run wealth is driven by a small set of great businesses, so attention should be focused there[22:53]

Attributes of a great business

Lists characteristics such as durable free cash flow in good and bad times, stable growth, and leadership in a growing industry with secular tailwinds[23:07]
• Also wants a long runway to grow, honest and capable management skilled in capital allocation, and a track record of above-average performance
• Seeks high and sustainable returns on invested capital, a strong balance sheet with low leverage, and minimal dilution from share issuance or compensation
Notes that most businesses won't tick every box, but these are useful guiding criteria[24:02]
Recommends the book "Quality Investing" by Lawrence Cunningham for learning more about great businesses[24:10]

Importance and evidence of moats

Buffett emphasized moats as central to his strategy, saying wide, sustainable moats drive investor rewards[24:48]
Notes capitalism constantly attacks excess returns, so a strong moat is needed to sustain them[24:48]
• Examples of obvious moats: network effects at Facebook and Instagram; less obvious ones: Costco's culture that's hard to replicate
He prefers to verify moats through numbers such as consistently high ROIC rather than claims from management or analysts[25:14]
• Cites MasterCard and Booking Holdings, both of which have maintained ROIC of around 40% over the past decade, as evidence of durable competitive advantages
Observes that companies with sustained high ROIC often keep it because their advantages are self-reinforcing; winners tend to keep winning[26:05]

The COLA test and rare category leaders

Mentions David Gardner's COLA test: when evaluating an industry leader, ask whether there is a "Pepsi to its Coke"[26:14]
• If there is no true equivalent competitor, the business may be uniquely positioned, like Google in search, Amazon in e-commerce, or Netflix in streaming
Shares his example of Constellation Software and its spin-offs[26:53]
• After reading Mark Leonard's letters, he saw Constellation as fitting his framework: strong free cash flow per share growth and a long runway, with no obvious large-scale imitator
• He values that management is honest, competent, and owns significant shares, making it easier to hold long term

Lesson 5: You will be wrong sometimes, and that's okay

Viewing losses as tuition and managing position sizes

Frames his 100% loss on his first investment as one of his best investments because of the lessons learned[27:47]
Quotes Bill Miller, who views losses in markets as tuition payments[27:53]
Argues that when you are young with small capital, it's acceptable to make mistakes because your main earning years lie ahead[28:03]
Recommends sizing positions such that you benefit meaningfully when right but aren't destroyed when wrong[28:23]
• A 1% position that triples might feel disappointing because it barely moves overall returns, suggesting high-conviction ideas should be larger

Diversification and risk

Notes that stocks with substantial downside risk should be smaller weights and allowed to "earn their keep"[28:32]
Argues that fewer positions doesn't automatically mean higher risk[28:43]
• One large position in diversified, durable companies like Berkshire or Amazon can be less risky than 10 concentrated tech stocks
Quotes Bill Ackman that individual investors should own at least 10 and as many as 20 securities, focusing on the best 10-15 high-quality, low-leverage businesses[29:11]

Process over outcome

States that an investor's success rate may be under 50%, so both hit rate and payoff magnitude matter[29:47]
Emphasizes prioritizing a good decision-making process instead of obsessing over individual outcomes[30:13]
• Good decisions can lead to bad outcomes and vice versa due to randomness, but over time a solid process wins
Warns against chasing what's popular or envying others who appear to get rich quickly[30:39]

Lesson 6: Valuation matters, but don't overemphasize it

Limits of relying on P/E ratios

Many beginners equate high P/E with expensive and low P/E with cheap, but cheap stocks are often cheap for good reasons[31:21]
Explains that value investing is not simply buying low-P/E stocks; otherwise everyone would buy something like eBay instead of Amazon[31:35]
Cites Buffett's definition of the best business as one that can deploy large amounts of capital at high returns over time, regardless of initial price metrics[31:52]

Netflix case study: high P/E but great business

Describes owning Netflix early, before he was influenced by low-P/E thinking[32:10]
• In 2016, Netflix had a market cap of about $60 billion and net income of ~$186 million, for a P/E around 320, with free cash flow of -$1.6 billion
Initially, that P/E shocked him, but the business was growing fast[32:37]
• Revenues were compounding at ~25% and global streaming subscribers at nearly 30%, while Netflix was rapidly launching in countries around the world
He notes that the P/E is backward-looking, while investors must consider what the company is becoming[33:40]
• Early international expansions are typically unprofitable but can become highly profitable as subscriber bases grow
• As leader with the most subscribers, Netflix could invest more in content while having lower content cost per subscriber than smaller rivals
Contrasts Netflix with a hypothetical slower-growing competitor at a P/E of 10-15, which might look cheaper but could be a far worse investment[34:16]
• Since 2016, Netflix shares have risen nearly tenfold, illustrating how traditional valuation metrics would have scared many away from a big winner

Second-order thinking about valuation

Suggests asking why a company trades at a high P/E and what the market sees that you might not[35:18]
Encourages looking beyond near-term financials to how the business is positioning itself and which variables management is actually optimizing for[35:26]

Lesson 7: Understand where your return will come from

Three sources of stock returns

References John Huber's framework that returns come from earnings growth, changes in the P/E multiple, and shareholder returns (buybacks and dividends)[36:32]
Says this framework helped him compare very different investments and stay focused on businesses rather than tickers[36:43]

Intrinsic value growth and stock price

Discusses François Rochon's idea that over the long run, stock price performance roughly matches the growth in intrinsic value[37:24]
• Rochon defines intrinsic value growth as earnings-per-share growth plus dividends, and market value growth as stock price change plus dividends
Notes that from 1996 to 2024, Rochon estimated intrinsic value of his portfolio compounded at 12.9% annually and market value at 13%[38:05]
Concludes that if you believe a company can compound EPS at ~12% for a decade, it is reasonable to expect similar stock price growth[38:20]
This reinforces viewing the stock market as a place to buy pieces of businesses and ride intrinsic value growth, not to gamble on short-term moves[38:59]

Lesson 8: Surround yourself with like-minded investors

Benefits of an investing peer group

Clay says value investing can feel solitary, but a network offers fresh perspectives on companies, markets, and portfolio management[39:13]
Peers can provide constructive feedback, help spot blind spots, and serve as a source of new ideas and industries to study[39:27]
Notes that relationships compound over time, just like investments, and can keep you grounded when markets are euphoric[39:44]

Example of using a curated investor community

Describes participating in a community of around 120 investors, many of whom invest full-time and share their highest-conviction ideas[44:20]
• Members give stock presentations and portfolio reviews, which help him peer into others' portfolios and discover quality ideas
Highlights that members work in varied industries, giving him insights into sectors he might otherwise overlook[44:58]
• He can reach out to someone who has already studied a company to get to the truth faster and decide whether to keep digging or move on

Lesson 9: Use clear megatrends to your advantage

Riding industry tailwinds

Argues that investing in businesses with strong, long-term tailwinds tilts the odds in your favor[45:38]
• In growing industries, leading companies can gain share of an expanding pie rather than fighting over a shrinking market
Lists megatrends like physical-to-digital commerce, digital advertising, cloud computing, cybersecurity, AI, and semiconductors[46:12]
Warns that you still must assess moats and capital intensity, since too much capital pouring into a hot industry depresses returns[46:25]

Example: digital advertising leaders

As a user of Meta ads, he sees firsthand their effectiveness, and identifies Meta, Google, and Amazon as clear digital ad leaders[47:31]
Predicts ongoing shift of ad dollars from billboards, radio, newspapers, and TV to digital due to superior measurement and targeting[47:55]
• Mentions the old line that half of marketing doesn't work and you don't know which half; with digital, you can now see exactly what works
Notes Meta has compounded revenues at 28% annually over the past decade, illustrating the power of this tailwind plus execution[48:25]

Example: semiconductors and AI picks-and-shovels

Describes semiconductors as foundational to smartphones, cloud, EVs, automation, and AI, making the industry a compelling megatrend[48:43]
Highlights ASML as having a near monopoly in its niche with very advanced technology and strong historical returns[49:09]
Mentions TSMC as another key enabler with an enviable industry position[49:27]
• Suggests that in an AI boom, many end applications may be hard to predict, but chipmakers and tool providers like ASML and TSMC should capture a lot of capital
Warns of industry cyclicality: chip demand ebbs and flows, and timing booms and busts is extremely hard[50:13]
• Recommends focusing on the long-term trend of rising compute, storage, and efficiency needs instead of trying to trade the cycle

Lesson 10: Understand investor psychology

Evolutionary roots of bad investing behavior

Explains that human brains evolved for immediate physical threats, not probabilistic financial decisions[50:53]
Emotions like fear, greed, and herd-following that once promoted survival now often cause irrational market behavior[51:03]

Loss aversion and cutting losers

Describes loss aversion: people feel losses about twice as strongly as equivalent gains[51:19]
In his first failed investment, he resisted selling after a 50% drop, hoping it would get back to breakeven before exiting[51:13]
Advises that if you realize you made a mistake in owning a business, you should usually cut losses and move on rather than waiting to "get back to even"[51:43]
• Reminds listeners that stocks don't know your purchase price and markets are forward-looking, so your entry point is irrelevant to future returns

Herd mentality and hot sectors

Explains that our desire to belong to groups and avoid rejection drives herd behavior in investing[52:37]
When others make money in a sector, fear of missing out can override logic and push us to buy at euphoric highs or sell in panics[53:01]
Says the best opportunities are often unpopular; value investors should look where the crowd is not excited[53:15]
References "flavors of the day" such as Zoom and remote-work stocks in 2020, tech and crypto in 2021, and AI in 2025[53:41]
• Zoom rose more than sixfold between February and October 2020 and then fell back below its starting level, illustrating boom-bust dynamics
Advises never to buy a stock just because friends, neighbors, or acquaintances are buying it or recommend it[54:33]
Suggests value investors can use herd effects by examining stocks whose prices have been punished more than fundamentals justify[55:17]
• Mentions Lululemon as an example where the stock price is down significantly and valuation has compressed, even as a few investors study it as a potential bargain

Overconfidence and confirmation bias

Notes studies showing 80-90% of people think they are better-than-average drivers, a logical impossibility mirrored in investing[55:59]
Overconfidence can lead to straying outside one's circle of competence, excessive risk-taking, use of leverage, or overconcentration[56:15]
Says markets are humbling even for great investors, so conviction must be balanced with humility[56:33]
Describes confirmation bias as seeking information that supports existing views and ignoring disconfirming evidence[57:03]
• This bias can cause investors to downplay red flags and cling to losing positions too long
Recommends actively seeking the bear case and asking what would have to happen for you to be wrong[57:39]
• Suggests surrounding yourself with thoughtful investors who challenge your assumptions to break out of echo chambers

Lesson 11: Avoid unnecessary complexity

Personal experiments with complex strategies

Clay admits trying covered calls, LEAP options, leverage, and owning companies outside his circle of competence[58:43]
He concludes all those activities were a waste of time and money for him[1:00:53]
Believes most investors can do well without options, leverage, overly complex models, excessive diversification, or market timing[1:00:09]

Simplicity as a superpower

Says he used to equate complexity with intelligence but later realized simple strategies can be more powerful[1:01:25]
Notes that complex businesses may hide risks and make it harder to detect when their compounding engine is breaking down[1:00:19]
Great investors often focus on a few key drivers of long-term performance and ignore most noise[1:01:27]
If you buy and hold a small set of great businesses and don't tinker much, just a couple of big winners can drive most long-term results[1:01:27]
Quotes Chris Mayer that outperformance often comes from letting winners grow into larger parts of the portfolio and riding them for a long time[1:02:17]

Lesson 12: Think for yourself

Developing independent conviction

Observes that people approach investing with different risk appetites, experiences, and goals, so there is no single right way[1:02:45]
Independent thinking means not outsourcing conviction to others, regardless of their credentials or track records[1:02:19]
Markets are noisy with headlines and opinions, but strong investors listen thoughtfully while still basing decisions on their own analysis and principles[1:03:09]
If you copy someone else's idea without doing your own work, you'll lack the conviction to hold when the stock falls 30%[1:02:33]
• He states that true conviction can't be borrowed; it must be earned through personal research

Accepting short-term turbulence in great investments

Shares that he believes your investments will often look crazy to others, and taking outside opinions too seriously can make you miserable[1:03:49]
Cites Buffett's Coca-Cola investment: Coke shares went up tenfold over 10 years while the S&P 500 tripled, but Coke only outperformed in 6 of those 10 years[1:05:09]
• This shows that even a phenomenal long-term decision may underperform for significant stretches
Warns that investors will face drawdowns of 20-40% even in their best holdings; the market will try to scare you out of good ideas[1:05:04]
Quotes Benjamin Graham that investors who panic during unjustified declines forfeit their basic advantage and might be better off if stocks had no quotes[1:05:39]

Choosing a philosophy that fits you and enjoying the journey

Reiterates that price is what you pay and value is what you get; most prices are roughly rational, so understanding business value is key[1:06:07]
Encourages selecting an investment approach consistent with your skills, goals, and personality to increase the odds you'll stick with it long term[1:05:59]
Recommends four books that shaped his thinking: "Richer, Wiser, Happier" (William Green), "The Joys of Compounding" (Gautam Baid), "100 Baggers" (Chris Mayer), and "The Warren Buffett Way" (Robert Hagstrom)[1:06:25]
Advises not to constantly compare your progress to others, since everyone's path is different[1:07:45]
Says investing is intellectually rewarding and can shape how you think, decide, and view the world, beyond just financial returns[1:07:55]
Notes that along the value investing journey, you can meet wonderful, like-minded people whose relationships become as rewarding as the financial gains[1:08:27]

Lessons Learned

Actionable insights and wisdom you can apply to your business, career, and personal life.

1

Starting early and investing consistently, even small amounts, lets compounding work over long horizons where timing the market becomes far less important than time in the market.

Reflection Questions:

  • • What is one concrete step I can take this week to automate a small, recurring investment into a diversified portfolio?
  • • How would my financial situation look in 10, 20, or 30 years if I focused on consistency instead of trying to pick perfect entry points?
  • • Where am I currently waiting on the sidelines for the "right time" instead of taking a reasonable, long-term action today?
2

Focusing on a handful of high-quality, moat-protected businesses and holding them patiently is often more powerful than trading frequently or owning many mediocre companies.

Reflection Questions:

  • • Which of my current investments truly meet the standard of being durable, understandable, and competitively advantaged?
  • • How might my portfolio change if I concentrated more on my best ideas and trimmed positions that don't meet a high quality bar?
  • • What signals would tell me a business I own has lost its moat or long-term edge, and how would I respond if I saw them?
3

A sound investment process-rooted in understanding how returns are generated, valuing intrinsic business growth, and managing risk-is more important than any single outcome or short-term performance swing.

Reflection Questions:

  • • If I wrote down my current investment process, where would it be vague, emotional, or dependent on other people's opinions?
  • • How can I more explicitly tie each investment decision to expected earnings growth, potential valuation change, and shareholder returns?
  • • What is one element of my process I could improve or simplify in the next month to make my decisions more consistent and repeatable?
4

Recognizing and managing psychological biases-like loss aversion, herd behavior, overconfidence, and confirmation bias-is essential to avoid self-sabotage and stick with rational, long-term decisions.

Reflection Questions:

  • • When was the last time I held onto a bad investment or idea mainly because I didn't want to admit I was wrong?
  • • In what situations am I most prone to following the crowd in markets, and what pre-commitments could I use to counter that impulse?
  • • How can I build a habit of deliberately seeking out disconfirming evidence before making or maintaining an investment decision?
5

Keeping your strategy and tools simple, staying within your circle of competence, and avoiding unnecessary financial engineering often leads to better long-term results and fewer costly mistakes.

Reflection Questions:

  • • Which parts of my current investing approach feel complicated or fragile, and what could I remove without losing effectiveness?
  • • How clearly can I explain each business I own-and why I own it-to a smart friend in plain language?
  • • What is one complex tactic (e.g., leverage, exotic instruments, excessive trading) I could dial back or eliminate to reduce risk?
6

Independent thinking-doing your own work, understanding your investments deeply, and selecting a philosophy aligned with your temperament-is crucial for maintaining conviction through volatility and avoiding reactive decisions.

Reflection Questions:

  • • Where am I leaning most on other people's conviction instead of my own understanding, and what research would help me close that gap?
  • • How well does my current investing style match my emotional tolerance for drawdowns, my time availability, and my long-term goals?
  • • What practices (such as writing theses, post-mortems, or checklists) could I adopt to strengthen my independent judgment over the next year?

Episode Summary - Notes by Kai

TIP763: Investing Lessons for My 18-Year-Old Self w/ Clay Finck
0:00 0:00