Essentials: How Your Brain Functions & Interprets the World | Dr. David Berson

with David Burson

Published October 16, 2025
View Show Notes

About This Episode

Andrew Huberman speaks with neuroscientist David Burson about how the nervous system creates perception, focusing on vision, color processing, circadian regulation, balance, and movement control. They explain how retinal circuits, melanopsin-containing ganglion cells, the vestibular system, cerebellum, midbrain, basal ganglia, and cortex interact to stabilize our view of the world and guide behavior. The conversation concludes with a striking example of cortical plasticity in a blind Braille reader whose visual cortex had been repurposed for touch.

Topics Covered

Disclaimer: We provide independent summaries of podcasts and are not affiliated with or endorsed in any way by any podcast or creator. All podcast names and content are the property of their respective owners. The views and opinions expressed within the podcasts belong solely to the original hosts and guests and do not reflect the views or positions of Summapod.

Quick Takeaways

  • Visual experience is fundamentally a brain phenomenon, even though it usually depends on signals originating from the eyes and retina.
  • Color vision arises from three cone photopigments tuned to different wavelengths, whose signals the brain compares to infer the spectral composition of light.
  • A separate class of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells uses melanopsin to measure overall light intensity and synchronize the circadian clock in the hypothalamus.
  • Light exposure at night can rapidly suppress melatonin through circadian pathways, independently of conscious visual perception.
  • The vestibular system senses head and body motion via fluid-driven hair cells in three semicircular canals, and works with vision to stabilize gaze through reflex eye movements.
  • Motion sickness often stems from a conflict between visual and vestibular signals about movement, such as when reading a phone in a moving car.
  • The cerebellum integrates sensory and motor information to coordinate precise movements and supports motor learning and error correction.
  • The midbrain superior colliculus combines visual, auditory, tactile, and even thermal inputs in some species to drive rapid orienting and avoidance responses.
  • Basal ganglia circuits, tightly linked with the cortex, help implement "go" and "no-go" decisions that underlie self-control and action initiation.
  • In congenitally blind individuals, visual cortex can be repurposed for tactile processing such as Braille reading, illustrating profound cortical plasticity.

Podcast Notes

Introduction and context for the discussion

Huberman Lab Essentials and host introduction

Andrew Huberman frames the Essentials series[0:00]
He explains that Huberman Lab Essentials revisits past episodes for the most potent and actionable science-based tools for mental health, physical health, and performance.
Host professional background[0:00]
Andrew Huberman identifies himself as a professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology at Stanford School of Medicine.

Introduction of guest David Burson

Longstanding relationship and expertise[0:16]
Andrew introduces his discussion with Dr. David Burson and notes that for more than 20 years Burson has been his go-to source for all things nervous system: how it works and how it is structured.
Goal for the conversation[0:30]
Andrew says he wants to ask Burson questions that will help people gain insight into the "machine" that makes them think, feel, and see.

Fundamentals of vision and visual perception

How we see: from photons to visual experience

Initial question about seeing a truck or a photo[0:47]
Andrew asks how a photon of light entering the eye leads to his ability to see a truck driving by or a photo of his dog on the wall.
Vision as a brain function[1:25]
Burson says the reason we have a visual experience is that the brain has some pattern of activity that it associates with input from the periphery.
He emphasizes that the experience of seeing is a brain phenomenon, not simply an eye phenomenon.
Visual experience without eyes: dreaming[1:17]
Burson notes you can have a visual experience with no peripheral input, such as when you are dreaming and seeing things that are not coming through your eyes.
In response to Andrew asking if dreams are memories, Burson says they may reflect your visual experience and can involve specific visual memories but are not necessarily just that.
Normal seeing via the retina[1:37]
Under normal circumstances, we see the world because we are looking at it and using our eyes.
Burson states that when we are looking at the exterior world, what the retina tells the brain is what fundamentally matters.
Retinal ganglion cells as the link to the brain[1:47]
He identifies ganglion cells as the neurons that are the key cells for communicating between eye and brain.
The eye is likened to a camera that detects the initial image and does some initial processing before sending that signal back to the brain.
Role of visual cortex and other brain areas[2:05]
Burson notes that it is at the level of the cortex that we have conscious visual experience.
He points out that many other places in the brain also receive visual input and do other things with that information, beyond conscious sight.

Color vision and the nature of light

Light as electromagnetic radiation[2:23]
In response to Andrew asking how we perceive reds, greens, and blues, Burson explains that light is a form of electromagnetic radiation.
He says we can think of light both as particles (photons) and as waves, like radio waves, and that either way of thinking is acceptable.
He compares electromagnetic frequencies to the frequencies on a radio dial.
Detectable wavelengths and color experience[3:11]
Only certain frequencies in the electromagnetic spectrum can be detected by neurons in the retina; those constitute what we see.
Within the visible range, different wavelengths are "unpacked" or decoded by the nervous system to lead to our experience of color.
Different wavelengths give us sensations of different colors through the activity of different neurons that are tuned to those wavelengths.
Phototransduction: photons to electrical signals[3:34]
Andrew restates that when light hits the eye, photoreceptors convert photons into electrical signals, and asks how this leads specifically to red vs. green vs. blue perception.
Burson explains that in the first layer of the retina, different photoreceptor cells make different molecules (photopigments) whose purpose is to absorb photons, the first step in vision.
Number and role of photopigments[4:05]
Burson states that altogether there are about five photopigment proteins we need to think about in a typical retina.
For seeing color, three of these are critical: three different proteins each absorb light with a different preferred frequency.
The nervous system keeps track of these three signals, comparing and contrasting them to understand the wavelength composition of light.
Example of color constancy and time of day[4:18]
Burson gives the example that by looking at a landscape, you can infer that it must be late in the day because things look golden.
This is due to absorbing the light from the world and the brain interpreting it based on the different composition of light reaching our eyes.

Subjective experience of color and its limits

Is my red your red?[4:54]
Andrew asks whether his perception of red is the same as Burson's, joking that his might be better.
Burson calls this a deep philosophical question that probably cannot ultimately be answered by usual empirical scientific methods because it concerns individual experience.
Biological similarity vs. experiential unknowability[5:17]
Burson says the biological mechanisms underlying color vision appear highly similar across individuals and across species.
He concludes that the physiological processes on the "front end" look very similar, but the level of perception or experience is much harder to access with biological vision science tools.

Photoreceptor types, melanopsin, and circadian signaling

Clarifying cone types, rods, and melanopsin

Three cone types for color[7:33]
Andrew mentions five "cone types" and Burson corrects him, saying there are really three types of cones involved in color vision.
Color vision is thought to require three different cone signals.
Rod photoreceptors for dim light[7:43]
Burson explains that one of the other photopigments is used mostly for dim-light vision: the rod cell pigment.
Rods are the cells that let you see when walking around on a moonless night at very low light levels.
Melanopsin photopigment introduced[7:58]
Burson notes another class of pigments, melanopsin, which they will talk more about later.
Andrew clarifies he had been thinking of ultraviolet and infrared, but Burson shifts to species differences in cone counts.
Species differences in cone types[8:18]
Burson explains that in human beings, most of us have three cone types and can see a corresponding range of colors.
In most mammals, including dogs and cats, there are only two cone types, which limits the range of wavelengths (colors) they can see.

The "odd" melanopsin photopigment and brightness detection

Melanopsin as a brightness sensor[7:58]
Burson describes melanopsin as the initial sensitive element in a system designed to tell your brain how bright things are in your world.
He calls it peculiar because of its anatomical location in the retina.
Retinal structure: layer cake and camera film analogy[8:59]
Burson asks listeners to think of the retina as a stack of thin layers, like a layer cake, forming a thin membrane at the back of the eye.
The outermost layer is where the classical photoreceptors (rods and cones) sit; this is analogous to the film of a camera where photons interact with photopigments to start neural signaling.
Andrew says he likes and adopts the camera-film analogy and adds that this outer layer is the surface on which the light pattern is imaged by the optics of the eye, creating a bitmap of neural signals across the retina.
Melanopsin in ganglion cells at the inner retina[9:45]
Burson explains that melanopsin is located at the other end of the retina, the innermost part, in ganglion cells.
Ganglion cells normally are output neurons that receive information from photoreceptors and relay it to the brain, but some ganglion cells unexpectedly make a photopigment themselves.
These melanopsin-expressing ganglion cells directly absorb light, convert it to neural signals, and send that information to the brain.
Connection to circadian system and blindness[10:11]
Burson states that this melanopsin system is the circadian system that keeps time and is built into our biology.
He notes that blind patients with retinal blindness often complain of insomnia because their circadian clocks are awake or misaligned in the middle of the night.
He explains their internal clocks (about 24.2 or 23.8 hours) drift out of phase without synchronization from light, leading to desynchronization with the day-night cycle.

The circadian clock, hypothalamus, and melatonin

Location and role of the master circadian clock

Distributed clocks vs. central pacemaker[11:34]
Andrew says he is fascinated that all cells of the body have roughly 24-hour clocks and asks where the main clock is and how it tells other tissues what to do.
Burson answers that clocks exist all over the body; most tissues have clocks, and the role of the central pacemaker is to coordinate them.
Suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in the hypothalamus[11:39]
Burson describes a small collection of nerve cells called the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), located in the hypothalamus, as the central circadian pacemaker.
He notes that this location is unusual for a structure receiving direct retinal input compared to other visual structures and emphasizes the hypothalamus as a great coordinator of drives.
Andrew jokingly calls the hypothalamus the source of many pleasures and problems, and Burson agrees.

How SCN influences body systems

Retinal input to SCN and surrounding control centers[11:52]
Burson notes that the SCN receives signals from the melanopsin pathway and sits among hypothalamic centers that control the autonomic nervous system and hormonal systems.
He says the hypothalamus uses these routes to control the rest of the body, and this is also true for the circadian center.
Outputs: autonomic, humoral, and higher centers[12:28]
Burson states that the SCN can influence the autonomic nervous system, the humoral (hormonal) system, and higher brain centers that organize coordinated rational behavior.
Andrew summarizes that the SCN has a 24-hour rhythm, matched to the external world via specialized retinal neurons, and then impacts the body via blood-borne signals and effects on autonomic function and cognition.

Melatonin regulation by light

Day-night melatonin profile[13:32]
Burson explains that if you measured melatonin hourly across the day, it would be low during the day and very high at night.
Acute suppression of melatonin by light[13:57]
He describes that if you get up in the middle of the night and turn on a bright fluorescent light to go to the bathroom, your melatonin level is "slammed to the floor."
This demonstrates that light is directly impacting hormonal levels through the described retinal-SCN-pineal pathway, beyond the visual scene you consciously perceive.
Burson highlights that while you consciously think about bathroom objects like a toothbrush, another system in your brain is "just counting photons" and shutting down melatonin release when light is high.

Vision, vestibular system, and balance

Introduction to vestibular system and its purpose

Vestibular system as motion detector[14:58]
Andrew shifts to a different aspect of the visual system related to balance, noting they will eventually offer tools to adjust nausea when the vestibular system is out of whack.
Burson says the vestibular system is designed to allow you to sense how you are moving through the world.
Sensing acceleration without other senses[15:55]
He gives the example that if you are sitting in a car and the driver accelerates, you would sense movement forward even with your eyes closed.
Even if your ears were plugged and your eyes closed, you would still know you were accelerating, showing vestibular detection of motion.
He says anything that jostles you out of your current position will generally be detected by the vestibular system.

Anatomy and function of vestibular hair cells and semicircular canals

Hair cells with cilia in the inner ear[15:40]
Burson describes the vestibular apparatus as being in the inner ear, with hair cells that have little cilia protruding from their surfaces.
Depending on which way the cilia are bent by fluid motion, the cells are either inhibited or excited, then communicate with neurons.
Contrast with cochlea and sound[16:05]
He contrasts this with the cochlea, where hair cells sense bouncing of the eardrum corresponding to sound waves.
Semicircular canals and axes of rotation[16:37]
In the vestibular apparatus, evolution has built sensors that detect the motion of fluid past those hairs in fluid-filled tubes.
When such a tube is rotated around its central axis, the fluid motion activates those sensors, giving a signal of head rotation.
Andrew likens the system to three hula hoops oriented in three directions, corresponding to three axes (yes, no, and a "puppy head tilt").

Vestibulo-ocular reflex and image stabilization

Brain decoding of canal signals[17:02]
Burson says the brain can "unpack" what these sensors are telling it about how you just rotated your head, such as left-right or up-down.
Reflexive eye movements opposite head motion[17:23]
He explains that a lot of vestibular processing occurs below conscious awareness as reflexes.
When you suddenly rotate your head to the left, your eyes automatically rotate to the right, even in complete darkness, due to vestibular signals.
Purpose of stabilizing retinal images[17:43]
Burson states that the brain works hard to stabilize the image of the world on the retina as much as possible.
He notes that because we are moving through the world, we cannot stabilize everything, but more stabilization generally improves vision.
He mentions that when scanning a scene we make rapid eye movements for short periods and then rest, which is part of this stabilization strategy.
Pigeon and chicken examples of stabilization[18:16]
Burson describes pigeons' head-bobbing as actually racking the head back on the neck while the body moves forward, keeping the visual image stable.
He cites chicken videos where moving the chicken's body up and down leaves the head in one place, another demonstration of stabilization.
He says many animals try to keep the image of the world stable on their retinas most of the time, making fast movements only briefly and then stabilizing again.

Visual-vestibular conflict and motion sickness; cerebellum and motor coordination

Visual-vestibular conflict as a cause of motion sickness

Two systems must agree on motion[20:47]
Andrew asks what is going on between vision and balance that causes nausea.
Burson says the fundamental problem in motion sickness is visual-vestibular conflict: two systems are telling the brain about movement, and as long as they agree, you are fine.
Driving example: agreement vs. conflict[21:02]
He uses the example of driving: the body senses forward motion via the vestibular system, and the visual system sees scenery sweeping past, which is consistent.
But if you are headed forward while looking at a cell phone, your retina sees a stable image or motion unrelated to body movement, creating a mismatch.
Burson says the brain "doesn't like" such uncoupling and complains with nausea to induce a change in behavior, which Andrew frames as being punished for looking at his phone.

Cerebellum as a coordinator and learning system

Cerebellum likened to air traffic control[22:31]
Andrew asks where visual and balance input are combined and mentions the cerebellum as a "mini-brain."
Burson describes the cerebellum as serving a function similar to an air traffic control system in air travel: a complicated system dependent on great information.
It takes in information about what is happening everywhere, from sensory systems and brain centers computing intended movements.
Role in movement coordination vs. paralysis[22:53]
Burson explains that the cerebellum has an important role in coordinating and shaping movements but is not required for basic movement or avoidance of paralysis.
Without the cerebellum, you would still have motor neurons and reflex centers but would not coordinate things as well, and timing between input and output would be off.
Cerebellum and motor learning precision[22:25]
He says that for learning athletic skills like an overhead tennis serve, you would be terrible at learning the sequence of muscle movements and using sensory feedback without a functioning cerebellum.
The cerebellum supports refining movement precision so you can, for example, reach for a glass of champagne without knocking it over or stopping short.

Cerebellar damage and ataxia

Clinical presentation of cerebellar lesions[22:47]
Burson says patients with cerebellar strokes or tumors may be unsteady on their feet, especially where dynamic adjustments are needed (e.g., standing on a streetcar without a pole).
They may exhibit tremor when reaching, overshooting and then overcorrecting, a pattern he describes.
Neurologists call this cerebellar ataxia, which can also result from damage to input or output tracts, not just within the cerebellum itself.

Flocculus, visual-vestibular integration, and error correction

Flocculus as an evolutionarily old region[23:32]
Burson notes that a key place where visual and vestibular information come together is the flocculus, one of the oldest parts of the cerebellum in evolutionary terms.
Image-stabilizing networks and learning[23:42]
He says the image-stabilizing network (like the vestibulo-ocular reflex) is centered there, and there is learning happening as well.
If the vestibular apparatus is somewhat damaged, visual input signals error to the cerebellum, which then learns to compensate by increasing vestibular output.
He characterizes this as an error-correction system, typical of cerebellar function across many domains of sensory-motor integration.

Midbrain (superior colliculus) and multisensory integration

Defining the midbrain in relation to spinal cord, brainstem, and cortex

From spinal cord to brainstem to midbrain[26:46]
Andrew notes that the midbrain sits beneath the cortex and has rarely discussed but important roles.
Burson asks listeners to imagine the nervous system as a big brain with a smaller "wand" (spinal cord) dangling into the vertebral column.
As you move upward, the spinal cord thickens in the skull into the brainstem, which expands due to evolutionary addition of processing structures.
Placement of the midbrain and its visual center[26:26]
Burson explains that the midbrain is the last enlarged portion of this brainstem before reaching relay structures that connect to cortex.
He identifies a very important visual center in the midbrain, the superior colliculus, as where most of the action is in interpreting visual input and organizing behavior.

Functions of the superior colliculus: orienting and reflexes

Reflexive reorientation to stimuli[27:02]
Burson characterizes this region as a reflex center that reorients the animal's gaze, body, or even attention to particular regions of surrounding space.
This can serve avoidance (e.g., predator appears at forest edge) or capture (approaching something) behaviors.
Example: sudden changes capturing gaze[27:56]
He notes that if something suddenly splats on a page while you are reading, your eye reflexively looks at it without conscious deliberation.
He says these brainstem centers emerged early in evolution to handle complex visual events that have spatial significance.

Multisensory inputs to the superior colliculus

Integration beyond vision: touch, sound, heat[28:56]
Burson explains that the superior colliculus receives input from many sensory systems that take information from the external world, not just vision.
These include touch, auditory inputs, and in rattlesnakes, input from heat-sensitive pits on their faces.
He says rattlesnakes use the same type of sensors humans use to feel warmth on their faces (e.g., near a bonfire), but evolution has specialized them to image where the heat is coming from.
Rattlesnakes combining thermal and visual cues[29:00]
Rattlesnakes use both vision and thermal sensing, and these systems converge in the midbrain tectal region to guide behavior.

General principles of sensory coding and cross-modal corroboration

Nervous system as an information-gathering and decision-making system

Different sensory receptors, same electrical language[29:10]
Andrew remarks that all these sensory systems (taste, heat, vision, etc.) are trying to gather information and feed it into a system that can make meaningful decisions and actions.
He notes that in the end it's just electricity flowing into the brain, regardless of whether information comes from eyes, ears, nose, or feet.
He points out that sensor placement differs across animals depending on species-specific needs.

Corroboration vs. conflict across senses

Example of integrating smell and heat[29:34]
Andrew gives an example of feeling heat on one side of his face and smelling something baking in the oven, with each cue weak on its own but stronger in combination.
He says such corroboration across senses occurs in the midbrain.
Conflict leading to confusion and motion sickness[30:48]
Burson adds that if sensory inputs are thrown into conflict, the brain becomes confused, which may underlie motion sickness.
He likens having multiple information sources to being a spy or journalist who wants many sources, but conflicting sources create a serious problem about what to believe or "publish."

Basal ganglia, go/no-go behavior, and individual differences

Basal ganglia location and relationship to cortex

Deep forebrain structures intertwined with cortex[33:13]
Andrew introduces the basal ganglia as a system involved in instructing us to do things and preventing us from doing things, and asks about their roles in go vs. no-go behavior.
Burson says the basal ganglia sit deep in the forebrain and are deeply intertwined with cortical function.
He notes that the cortex cannot really do what it needs to do without help from the basal ganglia, and vice versa.

Implementing go and no-go decisions

Cortical evaluation of contingencies[33:16]
Burson frames the problem logically: if you have the ability to withhold behavior or execute it, the cortex has to decide which, by considering contingencies and context.
Examples of self-control and action[32:59]
He cites examples like forcing yourself to go for a run in the morning when you do not want to, or making yourself stop a run even though you are enjoying it and want to keep going.
He also discusses the marshmallow test: children can have one marshmallow immediately or two if they wait 30 seconds, requiring a no-go decision to gain a larger future reward.
He explains that the cortex reasons that two marshmallows later are better than one now, but the child must withhold reaching for the immediate marshmallow to obtain that outcome.

Why go/no-go capacity varies between individuals

Brain complexity, genes, and experience[33:10]
Andrew asks why some people have more difficulty engaging go/no-go circuits, while others easily lean into tasks and complete them.
Burson attributes this to brains being complicated and shaped by both genetics and experience.
He notes that people have different genes and different experiences, so what is easy for one may be hard for another.
You don't choose your brain, but you can train it[35:21]
Burson says you are handed a brain and do not choose it, but there is a lot you can do with it through learning.
He mentions people can learn new skills, act differently, and show more restraint, tying this back to go/no-go behaviors.
Andrew notes that all the structures discussed are working in parallel with changing crosstalk between them.

Cortex and visual cortex plasticity in blindness

Cortex as seat of higher functions and beyond

Cortex roles and transition up the neuraxis[35:43]
Andrew notes they have worked their way up the neuraxis to the cortex, often considered the seat of higher consciousness, self-image, planning, and action.
He adds that the cortex is not just about those functions; it includes regions involved in other processes as well.

Visual cortex and repurposing in early blindness

What happens to visual cortex when the eyes are blind[36:05]
Andrew asks Burson to share an illustrative story about visual cortex, involving a person who had a stroke affecting that area.
Burson starts by noting that those who see have representations of the visual world in visual cortex.
He asks what happens when someone becomes blind due to eye or retinal problems; their visual cortex real estate expects visual input but receives none.
Case study: blind executive and Braille reading loss[37:25]
Burson recounts a case of a woman who was blind from very early in life and had become a high-level executive secretary.
She was extremely skilled at Braille reading and used a Braille typewriter for her work.
She suffered a stroke, was found collapsed at work, and brought to a hospital, where a neurologist informed her that the stroke was in her visual cortex.
The neurologist considered this "good news" because she was blind from birth and supposedly "not using" that visual area.
The problem was that she lost her ability to read Braille after the stroke.
Evidence for tactile takeover of visual cortex[37:49]
Burson explains that this case, supported by imaging studies in other individuals, suggests that in people blind from early in life, visual cortex gets repurposed for tactile processing, including Braille reading.
He notes that visual cortex had effectively become a center for processing tactile information from the fingertips.
Andrew calls the case incredible and somewhat tragic, but very informative.

Visual cortex as a general-purpose spatial processor

Spatial processing across modalities[38:15]
Burson says the story shows that visual cortex is a kind of general-purpose processing machine that is especially good at spatial information.
He notes that the skin of the fingers is another spatial sense, and in the absence of visual input, the brain rewires visual cortex to support tactile spatial tasks like Braille.
He emphasizes that this repurposing is particularly evident if people have trained extensively as Braille readers.
Bidirectional plasticity potential[38:29]
Andrew remarks that the process can also go the other way, where blind people can gain improved function in other modalities such as hearing or touch in the absence of vision.

Closing remarks and mutual appreciation

Summary of discussion scope

Top contour overview of nervous system organization[39:23]
Andrew says they have only hit the top contour of different areas of the nervous system, aiming to give a flavor of how it works, is organized, and how the areas talk to one another.

Recognition of guest's expertise

Burson as educator and resource[39:39]
Andrew calls Burson an incredible educator and a personal resource whenever he wants to reconnect with the beauty of the nervous system or think about new problems.
He jokes that he will continue to call Burson in the future, even if Burson changes his phone number.

Mutual appreciation and sign-off

Guest's closing remarks[39:47]
Burson says it has been a blast and that talking with Andrew gets his brain racing.

Lessons Learned

Actionable insights and wisdom you can apply to your business, career, and personal life.

1

Perception emerges from coordinated activity across multiple brain systems, so when your senses disagree-like vision and balance in motion sickness-the brain signals that something is wrong to prompt behavior change.

Reflection Questions:

  • Where in your daily life do you ignore signals of disagreement between different kinds of feedback (e.g., what you see, feel, or hear) that might be telling you to change course?
  • How could you use the idea of "sensory corroboration" to make better decisions when evidence is ambiguous or conflicting?
  • What is one situation this week where you can pause and check for multiple sources of information before acting, rather than relying on a single input?
2

Light is not just for seeing; it is a powerful regulator of your internal clock and hormones, meaning your light environment-especially at night-directly shapes sleep quality and physiology.

Reflection Questions:

  • How consistent are your light exposures in the morning and evening, and how might they be affecting your sleep and energy?
  • In what ways could reducing bright light exposure during late-night awakenings change how rested you feel the next day?
  • What specific change to your lighting routine (timing, brightness, or source) can you implement over the next week to better support your circadian rhythm?
3

Automatic stabilizing systems like the vestibulo-ocular reflex or cerebellar error correction show that practice and consistent feedback can train your brain to compensate for deficits and refine performance over time.

Reflection Questions:

  • What skill in your life currently feels "wobbly" or imprecise that might benefit from deliberate repetition with clear feedback?
  • How could you structure practice for that skill so that errors are immediately obvious and can be gradually corrected, similar to how the cerebellum tunes movements?
  • When will you schedule short, regular practice blocks for one targeted skill so your nervous system has repeated chances to adapt and improve?
4

Go/no-go behavior-whether you act on an impulse or hold back-is shaped by circuits that can be trained, even though they are influenced by genetics and past experience.

Reflection Questions:

  • In what situations do you most often struggle to say "no" to immediate gratification even when you know a better long-term option exists?
  • How might you design small experiments (like delaying a reward by a few minutes) to practice strengthening your own no-go circuits?
  • What one habit could you modify this week by inserting a short pause before acting, giving your "cortex" time to evaluate whether to go or not?
5

The brain's capacity for plasticity-such as visual cortex being repurposed for touch in early blindness-suggests that with focused training, unused or underused capacities can be redirected to support new abilities.

Reflection Questions:

  • Which of your own abilities are currently underutilized that could be repurposed or retrained to support a goal you care about?
  • How could you create a consistent training routine that channels your existing strengths (e.g., attention to detail, spatial skill) into a new domain?
  • What is one area of your life where you can commit to sustained, structured practice over the next month to give your brain a chance to rewire in your favor?

Episode Summary - Notes by Cameron

Essentials: How Your Brain Functions & Interprets the World | Dr. David Berson
0:00 0:00