Get Your Weekly Digest

Receive the best podcast summaries and insights delivered to your inbox every week.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.

Freakonomics Radio

647. China Is Run by Engineers. America Is Run by Lawyers.

with Dan Wong

Published September 19, 2025
View Show Notes

About This Episode

Host Stephen Dubner speaks with analyst and author Dan Wong about his framework for understanding the U.S. and China as, respectively, a "lawyerly society" and an "engineering state." Wong explains how China's engineer-dominated leadership prioritizes rapid infrastructure building, technological capacity, and even social engineering, while the U.S. legal culture emphasizes procedure, litigation, and blocking harmful as well as beneficial projects. Drawing on his years living in China, his family's history, and his book "Breakneck," Wong discusses zero-COVID, the one-child policy, manufacturing and process knowledge, China's global ambitions, and what each country could learn from the other.

Topics Covered

U.S.-China competition Manufacturing in China Manufacturing in USA Infrastructure investment COVID-19 response and public health policy Population control policy Economic development Lawsuits Innovation strategy Process knowledge

Disclaimer: We provide independent summaries of podcasts and are not affiliated with or endorsed in any way by any podcast or creator. All podcast names and content are the property of their respective owners. The views and opinions expressed within the podcasts belong solely to the original hosts and guests and do not reflect the views or positions of Summapod.

Quick Takeaways

  • Dan Wong argues that China functions as an engineering state whose leaders solve problems by building physical and social megaprojects, while the United States has evolved into a lawyerly society that excels at blocking actions through procedure and litigation.
  • China's engineering mindset has produced impressive infrastructure, manufacturing capacity, and technological catch-up, but it also underpins coercive policies like the one-child policy, ethnic assimilation campaigns, and zero-COVID.
  • Wong contends that the U.S. has lost much of its physical dynamism due to legal and procedural barriers, which hampers infrastructure, housing, transit, and defense production despite bipartisan desire to rebuild.
  • He emphasizes the importance of "process knowledge"-tacit, hands-on know-how accumulated through making things at scale-and argues that offshoring manufacturing to China also offshored this critical capability.
  • Wong believes economists, who blend empiricism with an understanding of dynamic social systems, were among the clearest critics of rigid population control policies like China's one-child policy.
  • He sees both the U.S. and China as unusually dynamic compared to Europe and Japan, and thinks each country could benefit from the other's strengths while avoiding their extremes.
  • Wong's experience living through China's zero-COVID policy, including mass lockdowns and sudden abandonment of controls, shaped his view of the Chinese state's periodic "manic episodes" after long periods of stability.
  • For Chinese emigrants like Wong's parents, life in quieter Western suburbs can feel less lucrative but more predictable and secure than navigating China's politically risky, high-stress success paths.

Podcast Notes

Framing the U.S.-China relationship and Dan Wong's core thesis

How Americans typically view China vs. Dan Wong's perspective

Common American perceptions of China[2:07]
• Dubner notes many Americans see China as a political and economic bully and a thief of U.S. intellectual property.
• He mentions views of China as a hardcore surveillance and propaganda state, internally and externally.
Dan Wong's view of similarities between Americans and Chinese[2:46]
• Wong says "no two peoples are more alike" than Americans and Chinese.
• He describes both peoples as hasty, willing to take shortcuts on health and wealth, and sharing a strong sense of the future.
• He contrasts this future orientation with what he sees as its absence in Europe or Japan.
Key difference: engineers vs. lawyers[2:59]
• Wong states that China is a country run by engineers, whereas the U.S. is a country run by lawyers.
• He characterizes engineers as driven to build and lawyers as driven to argue and obstruct.

Introduction of Dan Wong and his book

Dan Wong's background and letters from China[3:47]
• Wong was born in China in the early 1990s and immigrated to Canada at age seven, later moving to near Philadelphia in the U.S.
• He returned to China in his twenties as an analyst for an economic research firm and stayed for six years.
• Each year he wrote a long letter home about his life and observations and published it on his website, initially to update friends and parents.
• These letters gained broader attention, especially when he was stuck in China during the entirety of zero-COVID, when few others could observe and write about the country as he did.
His book "Breakneck" and the idea of an engineering state[3:56]
• Wong turned his letters into the book "Breakneck, China's Quest to Engineer the Future."
• He says China has been "solving seven problems a day before breakfast" because it has so many problems to solve.
• He warns that China's leaders are also "fundamentally social engineers" who treat society as just another big optimization problem.

Dan Wong's identity, role, and personal background

Self-description and professional role

How Wong labels his work[5:11]
• Wong introduces himself as a research fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and the author of "Breakneck, China's Quest to Engineer the Future."
• When Dubner asks what he "is" (researcher, journalist, analyst), Wong answers, "I am Dan Wong" and says he is an observer of China and of the U.S., partly as an outsider.

Current life and family context

Residence and spouse's work[5:58]
• Wong spends most of his time in Ann Arbor, Michigan, because his wife is a professor at the University of Michigan.
• She is an anthropologist of technology cultures and wrote a book about Shenzhen makerspaces titled "Prototype Nation."
• She grew up in Salzburg and is Austrian; they recently spent time hiking in the Austrian Alps.

Family history and generational experience in China

Origins in Yunnan and diverse family backgrounds[6:18]
• Wong was born in Yunnan, China's most mountainous province, which he calls part of China's periphery rather than its imperial core like Beijing, Shanghai, or Shenzhen.
• One grandfather barely survived famine and became an army officer; the other came from a once-rich family trading in copper, silk, liquor, and possibly opium.
• He notes his family includes people with elite and rural origins, but all suffered through the "great churn" of Communist Party rule under Mao Zedong.
His parents as part of China's "luckiest generation"[7:01]
• Both parents grew up as urbanites in China and were born in the 1960s, which Wong calls China's luckiest generation.
• They could attend university, have careers, build some wealth, and eventually emigrate abroad.
Impact of decade of birth and economic transition[7:37]
• Wong, age 33 at the time, reflects that decade of birth matters a lot in China.
• His mother started college under the socialist planned economy with ration tickets allowing pork once a month, but by her senior year most of that rationing system had melted away.
• He speculates that if his parents had been born around 1990 as urbanites, they might have been allocated multiple state apartments worth much more and could have more easily funded his overseas education.

One-child policy and personal impact

How the policy constrained his family[8:35]
• From around 1980 until 2016, the Chinese government enforced the one-child policy due to overpopulation concerns.
• Wong says his mother had to sign workplace documents after his birth promising not to have a second child and possibly consenting to sterilization.
• He learned about this when he was about seven or eight, shortly after the family moved to Canada, as his parents debated whether to give him a sibling.
Immigration challenges and childhood discipline[9:11]
• His parents moved to Canada just after the 1997 Asian financial crisis, which made it harder for them to find their footing.
• He describes himself as a rowdy child and says his parents enrolled him in the Royal Canadian Army Cadets to straighten him out.
• He thrived there, joining the army band, excelling at drill, and becoming Cadet of the Year.

Education, early career, and move to China as an analyst

Academic path and early tech work

University and tech industry experience[9:55]
• Wong studied philosophy at the University of Rochester but dropped out to work at Canadian e-commerce startup Shopify.
• He later spent time in Silicon Valley and Germany and eventually completed his college degree.
• Freelance writing on Chinese drone technology for Vox led to a job at GovCal Dragonomics, an investment research firm focused on the Chinese economy.

Role at GovCal Dragonomics and focus on Made in China 2025

Nature of the research work[10:15]
• He moved to Hong Kong in 2017 to work for GovCal Dragonomics, serving a financial audience including hedge funds, pensions, and asset allocators.
• He describes the firm as a mix of journalists, diplomats, analysts, and executives all trying to figure out "what China is."
Studying "Made in China 2025" and party texts[10:45]
• Wong was tasked with studying "Made in China 2025," Beijing's grand ambition to dominate 10 strategic future industries including electric vehicles and new materials.
• He notes early skepticism about China's ability to innovate and build cars better than Germans and Japanese, but he felt China would build cars and industrial robotics at scale.
• He took China seriously by reading core party-state texts, including major Xi Jinping speeches published in the theory magazine "Seeking Truth" (Qiu Shi).
• He describes "Seeking Truth" as a beautifully produced magazine sent monthly to party members and others like him.
Formal vs. informal China and field travel[11:37]
• Wong saw China as having a formal system of Communist Party propaganda explaining its goals and an informal reality of casual social life.
• He traveled extensively to first-tier cities (Beijing, Shanghai), villages, and third- and fourth-tier cities across the countryside.
• He reports that Chinese people are generally informal, openly and bitterly complaining about problems, except when it comes to fear of Xi Jinping.

Status as a Chinese-origin foreigner and experiences with censorship and risk

How the Chinese state views people of Chinese heritage

Perception as a "ward of the state"[13:20]
• Wong says that if you are of Chinese heritage, the Chinese government views you essentially as a ward of the state for life, regardless of where you grew up or how long your family has been abroad.
• He finds this frightening and stresses his pride in being Canadian and his happiness as a U.S. resident, rejecting that imposed identity.

Concerns for personal safety and website ban

Being blocked within China[13:54]
• Wong says he was concerned for his safety at several points.
• In 2022, the Chinese government banned his website inside China; he was surprised his small personal site was treated like a major outlet deserving a ban.
• He consulted the Canadian consul general in Shanghai to ask if he needed to leave quickly.
• He was told it might have been an algorithmic government decision and that it was unclear; he had no way to ask censors directly.
Decision not to self-censor and the "anaconda" metaphor[15:20]
• Wong decided he would write about China as best he could and not worry if someone found it inflammatory.
• He cites technologist Perry Link's metaphor of censorship as an anaconda coiled in a chandelier above a dinner table, where guests self-censor for fear the snake might wake and attack.
• He explains that most censorship is self-censorship driven by uncertainty about when the "anaconda" will strike.
• He notes that sometimes the anaconda is effectively "paper"-you can say things and nothing happens-but the uncertainty still shapes behavior.

Living through China's zero-COVID policy and its political implications

COVID-era confinement in China and its effect on his writing

Impact of COVID on his trajectory and book[15:58]
• Wong stayed in China from early 2020 until the end of 2022 without leaving, effectively trapped by zero-COVID policies.
• He believes that without COVID he would have continued studying U.S.-China relations and technology but would not have been able to write much of this book, as the zero-COVID period was shocking and revealing.

Three acts of zero-COVID

Act I: Anger and fear in early 2020[16:46]
• In winter-spring 2020, a new respiratory virus emerged from Wuhan, leading to anger at the Chinese government for a second major respiratory outbreak in two decades (after SARS in 2003).
• He notes the government again tried to suppress whistleblowers describing medical conditions, repeating early SARS mistakes.
Act II: Relative success and pride by mid-2020[17:41]
• By April-May 2020, China had contained the virus relatively well, and people saw harsh zero-COVID measures as effective for stopping transmission chains.
• Measures included mandatory quarantine in convention centers or stadiums for positive cases, contact-tracing apps, widespread closures, and outdoor mask requirements.
• Despite strain, most people decided the costs were worth it; restaurants and the economy started reviving.
• Wong recalls early commentary that COVID might be China's "Chernobyl moment," but instead many felt the U.S. (under Donald Trump) looked like the chaotic failure.
• His parents, in a move he calls "very un-Chinese," told him not to visit them in Pennsylvania in 2020 because the U.S. was a mess and China was better ordered.
Act III: Shanghai lockdown and abrupt abandonment of zero-COVID[18:54]
• In spring 2022, Shanghai underwent what Wong calls perhaps the most ambitious lockdown ever attempted: 25 million residents largely could not leave their apartment compounds for about 10 weeks due to Omicron spread.
• Xi'an also experienced a prolonged lockdown; people felt food insecure because the city had no adequate plan for food delivery under lockdown conditions.
• Patients needing diabetes or cancer treatment were told to stay home to prevent COVID spread.
• Dissatisfaction grew nationwide, with protests erupting in some places; he personally went to Shanghai protests in October 2022.
• He describes residents screaming out their windows for hours during lockdown, and drones broadcasting messages telling them to comply with COVID restrictions and not "open the window or sing."
• Eventually the central government abruptly stopped pursuing zero-COVID, dropping barriers over about a week, turning "zero COVID" into "total COVID."
• He says the government did little to prepare people for a virus it had spent three years frightening them about, instead letting it run rampant in the coldest month, when many died.
Excess deaths and Wong's broader interpretation[21:07]
• Dubner cites research in JAMA estimating nearly 2 million excess deaths in China among people 30+ in the first two months after zero-COVID was dropped.
• Wong's 2022 letter argued that over seven decades China has had long periods of stability punctuated by government-triggered chaos, likening episodes like zero-COVID to manic spells followed by the state regaining its senses.

Purpose and structure of Wong's book "Breakneck"

Why he wrote the book and intended audience

Showing Americans a textured picture of China[24:06]
• Wong believes most Americans will never visit China and many are not very curious about it, sometimes rationally fearing for their safety or finding it unattractive.
• He wanted to convey that Shanghai is a "wonderful, splendid" city, Beijing is solid and splendid, Shenzhen resembles Silicon Valley with boring office parks, and Chongqing is the most "hydropunk" city in the world.
• He aims to build mutual curiosity by providing concrete texture of places, not just abstract geopolitics.
Need for a new framework beyond old political labels[24:58]
• Wong argues that it no longer makes sense to analyze U.S. and China via 19th-century terms like socialist, capitalist, autocratic, or neoliberal.
• He proposes a "playful new framework": China as an engineering state building big at breakneck speed, versus the U.S. as a lawyerly society blocking everything it can, good and bad.

Defining the engineering state: China's leadership and social engineering

Engineer-led leadership and prestige through building

Composition of top Chinese leadership[25:34]
• At points in recent history, all nine members of the Politburo Standing Committee held engineering degrees, often in Soviet-style fields like hydraulic, thermal, or mechanical engineering.
• He says China's leadership is not focused on "soft, fuzzy" creative expression but on gaining political prestige by building highways, megaprojects, dams, coal plants, hyperscalers, and homes.

Downsides: social engineering and control of populations

Population as an optimization problem[26:19]
• Wong argues that beyond physical and economic engineering, Chinese leaders are social engineers who treat the population as a giant math exercise.
• He links this mindset to the one-child policy and to zero-COVID, noting the numeric rigidity in the latter's name.
Ethnic minorities and "engineering of the soul"[26:52]
• He discusses ethno-religious minorities in Tibet and Xinjiang who suffer under efforts to "sinify" them, as their cultures are treated as expendable and in need of harmonization into Han culture.
• Wong mentions relocation of Tibetans from highland Himalayas to lowland apartment blocks where they can be more easily monitored.
• He notes large detention centers and camps built for Uyghurs in Xinjiang as part of these engineering projects.
• He cites Joseph Stalin's phrase "engineer of the soul," which Xi Jinping has recently repeated, to describe the party's ambition to shape inner life as well.

Mountains as refuge from the state and James C. Scott's influence

Mountains as hiding places[28:10]
• Wong's 2022 letter opened with the line "mountains offer the best hiding places from the state," reflecting both his origin in mountainous Yunnan and his political reading.
James C. Scott's work on state avoidance[28:30]
• He cites Yale scholar James C. Scott, whose book "Seeing Like a State" analyzes how states try to organize populations for control.
• He praises Scott's book "The Art of Not Being Governed," which describes Zomia, a highland region from southwest China to Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia where people fled states to escape taxation, conscription, and disease.

Defining the U.S. as a lawyerly society

Lawyers in American leadership and founding

Evidence of lawyer dominance[29:27]
• Wong notes that many people in the White House have Yale Law School backgrounds; Politico counted around 140 lawyers in the Biden White House, about 25% of them from Yale Law.
• He points out that many founding fathers were lawyers and that the Declaration of Independence reads like a lawsuit initiating a legal argument.
• He says the Democratic Party is especially lawyerly.

Why he uses "lawyerly society" instead of "state"

Participation of property owners and litigation[30:39]
• Wong calls it a lawyerly society because the legalistic behavior is something "we all participate in," not just government elites.
• He acknowledges lawyers can protect people with property, but argues in practice they mostly protect those who have already "made it"-the rich.
• He says property owners often sue to block new housing, mass transit, or highways near them.

Consequences: infrastructure decay and blocking behavior

From engineering state to lawyerly society in the U.S.[30:25]
• Wong acknowledges the U.S. used to be an engineering state, with major growth from the 1850s to 1950s: canals, interstate railways, skyscrapers, highways, the Manhattan Project, and Apollo.
• He argues that by the 1950s-60s, overbuilding and abusive decisions like highways rammed through urban neighborhoods (Robert Moses), ubiquitous pesticide spraying (DDT), and fossil-fuel cozy regulation spurred backlash.
• Elite law schools produced a generation of regulators and litigators under slogans like "sue the bastards," targeting both big government and big business.
Lawyers as blockers and cost of procedure[33:02]
• He asserts that lawyers are very good at saying no and "block everything good and bad."
• He contrasts China building functional infrastructure with the U.S., which he says has little functional infrastructure but also avoids extreme policies like the one-child policy.
• He cites New York City's housing shortage and high rents as a symptom of not building enough housing.
• NYU data show New York spends about $2 billion per mile of subway, around 8-9 times more than Rome, Paris, or Barcelona.
• California High-Speed Rail is another example: nearly 20 years after voter approval, it remains largely unbuilt, with the first segment opening only sometime after 2030.
• He attributes delays partly to legal systems that make it easy for vested interests to sue over alleged environmental review deficiencies, and to agencies focused on process rather than outcomes.

Economic stagnation, political dysfunction, and lawyerly culture

Perceived loss of dynamism and political consequences[35:59]
• Wong connects weak infrastructure, high prices, and struggles at apex manufacturers like Intel, Boeing, and Detroit automakers to a common feeling that America lacks dynamism.
• He argues when the economy serves mostly elites-whom lawyers are best set up to serve-people become angry, contributing to political dysfunction.
• He notes concerns that the U.S. defense industrial base and manufacturing capabilities (e.g., semiconductors, top jets, munitions replenishment for Ukraine) are struggling.
• He observes both left and right show some interest in re-empowering government to build and in restraining excessive litigation that strangles core functions.

What the U.S. could learn from China's engineering state

Reinvigorating infrastructure and civic optimism

Borrowing some of Robert Moses's engineering spirit[37:03]
• Wong says the U.S. needs a bit of Robert Moses's engineering spirit today because New York has not built enough infrastructure.
• He highlights China's massive build-out of mass transit, parks, power capacity, and tall bridges, even in poor areas, as both an economic and political strategy.
• He argues that seeing new subway lines, bridges over rivers, and more pleasant cities fosters optimism and pride, providing "propaganda of the deed" that genuinely resonates with people.
Manufacturing responsiveness during COVID[38:14]
• Wong notes that in early COVID the U.S. struggled to retool manufacturing for basic goods like masks and cotton swabs.
• He contrasts this with China, which had no shortage of such items, underscoring China's superior manufacturing agility.

Pollution, rare earths, and offshored externalities

China's role in dirty industries[38:51]
• He explains that China has absorbed many highly polluting industries, such as rare-earth processing.
• Rare earths are not especially rare; about 20 elements are classed as such, and many countries could mine them, but processing is so energy-intensive and polluting that only China has the "stomach" to do it.
• He notes that cancer rates near rare-earth processing towns in China are "off the charts."
• He quotes Deng Xiaoping stating in the 1980s that China doesn't have much, but it has rare earths and will process them, framing it as national strategy.

Why Wong favors economists over pure engineers or lawyers in government

Defense of economists as synthesizers

Economists' blend of empiricism and social understanding[40:21]
• Wong jokingly notes that praising economists is not a good position in the academy, where many blame them for the world's wrongs.
• He admires economists for synthesizing the best of lawyers and engineers: they are empirical, data-driven, and aware that social systems are dynamic.
• He credits economists with being leading critics of China's one-child policy and of similar ideas floated in the U.S. after Ehrlich's "The Population Bomb."
• He says economists saw population change as dynamic-wealth and education can lower fertility-rather than something to control via rigid engineering.

China's ambitions, innovation, and technological competition with the U.S.

Intended readership and U.S. political figures

Who Wong imagined reading "Breakneck"[43:48]
• Wong says he wrote for a smart, curious American-"a lawyer in Ohio"-who wants to understand China from someone who knows the language and lived there during deteriorating U.S.-China relations.
• Dubner mentions J.D. Vance (a Yale Law graduate) as a possible reader; Wong agrees Vance might find the book confirmatory of some of his arguments, though Wong is not as critical of Yale Law as Vance is.

Does China seek regional hegemony or global supremacy?

Historical self-conception: Middle/Celestial Kingdom[45:00]
• Wong affirms that China views itself as the center of the world: "Middle Kingdom" can also be translated "Central Kingdom," and late Qing rulers called it the "Celestial Empire."
• Historically, China saw others as barbarians; the question is how that worldview translates into modern policy.
Regional hegemony vs. broader conquest[46:18]
• He suggests regional hegemony might mean leaders of Malaysia, Vietnam, and the Philippines regularly coming to Beijing to metaphorically kowtow to China's top leader.
• He questions whether such regional dominance would severely threaten U.S. interests if neighbors pay fealty but China doesn't seek to seize countries like Japan or Russia.
• He believes China wants to be a great power with credibility at home by being a center of culture and order and by producing splendid goods others lack-historically porcelain, silk, and tea.
• He recalls the Qing emperor telling British envoy Lord Macartney that China had no use for British "splendid trinkets" because it was self-sufficient in the best goods.
• In modern terms, he imagines China showcasing drone shows, world-class electric vehicles, and fantastic cities as proof of its superiority.

From IP theft to innovation and "ladder" metaphor

Has China only stolen or also innovated?[47:49]
• Wong acknowledges China has stolen a lot of American IP but argues this is not the most relevant frame for U.S.-China competition.
Laying ladders vs. climbing ladders[48:17]
• He proposes that the U.S. is good at laying ladders-creating new industries-while China is good at climbing ladders and scaling those industries.
• He uses solar as an example: Bell Labs in New Jersey invented the first solar cell in 1954, but the U.S. treated solar as a science project; Germany then advanced the industry, and China ultimately dominates it.
• Today, about 90% of the solar industry, from polysilicon processing to finished PV cells, is Chinese.
• He often asks U.S. policymakers which is more glorious: inventing a product but not owning the industry, or actually owning the industry.

Zero-sum versus dynamic technological competition

Interdependence in technology development[49:18]
• Wong resists a pure zero-sum framing, emphasizing that technological progress is dynamic and often cross-national.
• He notes that advances in engines came from German machinery, itself building on British textile industry foundations.
• He worries that U.S. loss of TV manufacturing to Japan in the 1980s seemed minor then, but undermined broader consumer electronics capabilities later.
• Shenzhen's mastery of iPhone assembly enabled it to become a global center for drones (e.g., DJI) and batteries; he suggests that if this work had been in the U.S. Midwest, those capabilities might have developed there instead.

Process knowledge, reshoring efforts, and critiques of Biden and Trump approaches

Defining process (tacit) knowledge in technology

Three components of technology[50:10]
• Wong breaks technology into three parts: hardware/equipment; written instructions (patents, blueprints, recipes); and process (tacit) knowledge, the practical experience of doing.
• Using a kitchen analogy, he says giving a novice cook a great kitchen and recipes doesn't ensure they can even fry an egg; what's missing is process knowledge.
• He calls process knowledge "the fundamental Chinese advantage" in technology: they've had to solve many problems daily and accumulate vast practical experience.

Evaluating reshoring under Biden and Trump

Critique of Biden administration's implementation style[51:45]
• Wong says it's important for the U.S. to engage in some reshoring and credits Biden for big spending moves like the CHIPS Act, Bipartisan Infrastructure Act, and Inflation Reduction Act.
• However, he criticizes the Biden administration for moving slowly in a "plotting, proceduralist, lawyer-led" manner, with much money not yet allocated before Biden lost re-election in this narrative.
• He argues Trump's administration will have many opportunities to put his name on projects because Biden's team was so lawyerly and slow.
Why he doubts Trump's reshoring will work[51:49]
• Wong calls Trump a product of the lawyerly society: although not a lawyer, lawsuits are central to his business and political life.
• He notes Trump has sued business partners, political opponents, and even former lawyers, and learned from Roy Cohn, whom he associates with modern "lawfare."
• He is skeptical that reshoring under Trump will work because, in his view, Trump is weakening U.S. strengths in science and technology.
• He cites a roughly 40,000-worker decline in manufacturing employment since "Liberation Day in April" (a phrase he uses) as significant skill loss.
• He argues it's not intuitive to become a greater scientific superpower by cutting funding to agencies like the National Science Foundation and NIH, attacking universities, deporting workers, or intimidating higher-skilled researchers at the border.

Experiences and attitudes among Chinese expats and Wong's parents

How Chinese expats view China and the West

Pride, skepticism, and comparative order[55:41]
• Wong says many Chinese expats still feel considerable pride in China's economic achievements compared with other developing countries like India, Brazil, and Indonesia.
• He notes skepticism among some about Western democratic impulses, pointing to disorder on New York streets and the January 6 events.
• Some Chinese living in New York or California conclude life is easier in Shanghai: similar salaries for U.S.-educated returnees, higher savings, better transit, and stronger public order.

Counterfactual: Wong's life if his family had stayed in China

Constrained intellectual and career options[56:56]
• Wong believes that had his parents not emigrated, he likely would not have been able to pursue the intellectual projects that now drive him, including writing this book.
• He imagines he might be working at a state-owned enterprise, bored and underpaid, or at a tech company with a 9-9-6 schedule (9 a.m. to 9 p.m., six days a week), which would be more interesting but very stressful.

His parents' assessment of immigration's value

Contentment with quiet suburban life[57:23]
• Wong says he has open communication with his parents and describes them as content with their suburban Philadelphia lifestyle, though he personally finds it dreary.
• Comparing themselves to college classmates in China, his parents see that many peers have far more money but also much higher stress and political risk, including industries wiped out after crossing political lines.
• He notes that while their life is quieter, that quiet has "worked very well for them."

Choosing where to live and comparing U.S., China, and Europe

Future children and geographic choices

Europe and the "mausoleum economy" concept[1:00:13]
• Wong and his wife, who do not yet have children, think a lot about where they would want to raise them.
• After spending two months in Europe, they concluded Europe likely is not the right place due to "strange, stagnant issues."
• He uses the phrase "mausoleum economy" to describe Europe's dynamism focused on the past, with societies "too sniffy" to embrace American or Chinese practices.
• He maintains that the U.S. and China are far more dynamic than Europe or Japan and will continue to drive the future, whether or not their governments try to stop it.

Shared dynamism of the U.S. and China vs. other rich countries

Similarities between Americans and Chinese revisited[1:01:20]
• Wong reiterates that no two peoples are more alike than Americans and Chinese, in contrast to more perfectionist, cozy societies like Europe and Japan.
• He says he is not sure "optimistic" is the right word, but he believes the U.S. can still change for the better, especially on economic issues.

Dubner's reflections on the lawyerly backlash and Trump, and closing exchange

Lawyerly society backlash and Trump's appeal

Trump as anti-lawyerly figure yet legalistic actor[1:02:32]
• Dubner suggests that Wong's framework of engineers vs. lawyers explains much of recent history and that in the U.S. there is backlash against lawyerly approaches.
• He proposes that backlash helps explain Trump's popularity: Trump often says what he is thinking and does what he wants, which feels anti-lawyerly to some, even though he also uses lawfare and litigation extensively.

Coining "chilosopher" and future hopes

New label for Wong's role[1:02:59]
• Dubner tells Wong he has come up with a label for him: "chilosopher"-a philosopher whose understanding of China is deep in many dimensions.
• Wong laughs and says he will "toy with it," calling it Dubner's portmanteau to adjust.

Post-interview coda on Wong's parents and New York housing

Desire to move parents to a more vibrant neighborhood[1:05:08]
• In a brief epilogue, Wong says he would love to move his parents to a more vibrant part of New York; his favorite area is Sunset Park.
• Asked if he has bought them a house there, he replies that it depends on how the book does and jokes about making a down payment.

Lessons Learned

Actionable insights and wisdom you can apply to your business, career, and personal life.

1

Complex systems like countries are shaped by dominant professional mindsets: an engineering mentality pushes toward building and optimization, while a legal mentality pushes toward procedure and blocking, so leaders need to consciously balance these tendencies rather than let one group define the whole system.

Reflection Questions:

  • • Where in your organization or community do you see an imbalance between 'builders' and 'blockers,' and how is that shaping outcomes?
  • • How could you bring a more constructive, engineering-like mindset to a process that currently feels dominated by rules, approvals, or risk-avoidance?
  • • What specific decision this month could benefit from asking both 'How do we build this safely?' and 'What guardrails are truly necessary?' instead of defaulting to only one perspective?
2

Tacit process knowledge-hands-on, accumulated know-how-is as critical as formal plans or tools, and losing the places where this knowledge is practiced leads to long-term capability loss that is hard to quickly rebuild.

Reflection Questions:

  • • What key skills or processes in your work rely heavily on implicit know-how that only a few people actually possess?
  • • How might your team be vulnerable if certain experienced people left tomorrow and took their process knowledge with them?
  • • What is one concrete way you could start capturing, teaching, or practicing critical tacit skills more deliberately over the next quarter?
3

Top-down social engineering, even when technically sophisticated, can produce severe human costs when people are treated as variables in an optimization problem rather than as agents with their own goals and values.

Reflection Questions:

  • • Have you ever designed a policy or process that optimized for metrics but overlooked how it felt or functioned for the people subjected to it?
  • • How could you better incorporate feedback from those affected before rolling out large changes to systems you control?
  • • What small pilot or safeguard could you add to your next big initiative to ensure you can adjust if unintended harms begin to appear?
4

Regimes of excessive litigation and proceduralism can paralyze beneficial projects just as effectively as authoritarian overreach can impose harmful ones, so governance should aim for accountable action, not just constraint.

Reflection Questions:

  • • Where in your life or organization do you see important work stalling because of fear of rules, complaints, or potential disputes rather than real risk?
  • • How might you redesign an approval or review process you control so that it still protects against abuse but makes it easier to say 'yes' to high-value projects?
  • • What is one example where you could replace an open-ended 'no by default' posture with clearer criteria for a fast 'yes if these conditions are met'?
5

Economic and technological strength depend not only on inventing new ideas but also on owning and maintaining the industries that scale and refine them, which requires long-term strategic choices about what to build and keep at home.

Reflection Questions:

  • • In your own career or business, are you focusing only on generating ideas, or are you also building the capacity to execute and own the downstream value?
  • • How might your long-term prospects change if you invested more in the 'boring' but durable capabilities that turn concepts into reliable products or services?
  • • What is one strategic capability you currently outsource that might be worth slowly bringing in-house or more closely partnering on over the next few years?
6

Migration and life choices often trade financial upside for stability and autonomy; deliberately recognizing your own and your family's risk tolerance can clarify which paths are truly "worth it."

Reflection Questions:

  • • Looking back at your own or your family's big moves, what risks paid off and what hidden costs emerged only later?
  • • How much instability or political risk are you personally willing to tolerate in exchange for higher upside in income or opportunity?
  • • What is one upcoming life or career decision where explicitly naming your risk tolerance could help you choose more confidently between competing options?

Episode Summary - Notes by Dakota

647. China Is Run by Engineers. America Is Run by Lawyers.
0:00 0:00